From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41DC9382288; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776946454; cv=none; b=eBmeqXC1Cd+Ftq83Zfs0e37rOpvQS9NnUfZuDxAkusQWEkuVMkrImZn8h1l9hIOEA9n29bji4UgRIw7LosC6f0HMbDMnFgNY66hsSMwaWxBQkULfL/wH9iMRyhVposZgF8HsDMTChqr4fbJP/pjTg0YeZw+/FT7YjeYEeC4Iq/o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776946454; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hPWLVNZGfvg7xxQEwP/A/HiM96fztS75ceThmP4IroA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BSUDmkBDfyi5Ai/f99Z6fnkl6AOH22/O7zyQ99SLc07z/SMMI63yvzIXQHBuwLPLzP3nRWSh1gEDxfQWn6LlDV74OFRQ1pTN+/b0p+NVhEqv71Nr76BB+p+TCFjLitEqgjVm/yfXfnG/Z9b+D3jXfqf7kYBigiNzuCjG+zvRARI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=e8wd9O+h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="e8wd9O+h" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=ImGXxTVYjTzC5+KMI/sxy/q4lpK9EKCgYwT08oZOWrA=; b=e8wd9O+hjho6+Ng3U0m1q4Z3ii c5JFSMRFTwYHnKIW3taM06quURrlL/mx3mqgeKVam6vecldKT2KJlvFZojBYsvT4x+btSPoXgpFYR gxKpJQU2tFXZlW8483PYTidF7i2xanCNl0IV7dkzaYRY7WuiIaVKinAJBhJUA++57hck=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wFswY-00HEv8-AK; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:14:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:14:06 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Jakub Raczynski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/stmmac: Fix typos: 'tx_undeflow_irq' -> 'tx_underflow_irq' Message-ID: <4b90a06a-4e67-4c8e-9749-1b48e9c32c13@lunn.ch> References: <20260421115008.2690541-1-j.raczynski@samsung.com> <7eb9e4d4-909c-4203-833d-bd8b664fdfbc@lunn.ch> <52b06f0a-8283-4903-9d8a-2bbdf637dd5d@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > Question is whether this should then remain that way forever? > And was it really part of some ABI if no one noticed? Hard to say. I could also be that people did notice, but after it got released in a kernel, which makes it ABI. It can be very hard to fix these issues, if you don't catch them in -rcX kernels. The other patches in this series look O.K, please drop this one and repost once net-next is open. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html Andrew