Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Eddie Hao <eddieh@google.com>,
	Vlad Dumitrescu <vladum@google.com>,
	Xiaotian Pei <xiaotian@google.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:55:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ba606ff-34ee-6cb3-40e4-2d004b8689dd@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190118184218.wckefzgzepbciurq@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On 01/18/2019 07:42 PM, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:31:57PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> This adds the ability to read gso_segs from a BPF program.
>>
>> v2: refined Eddie Hao patch to address Alexei feedback.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Cc: Eddie Hao <eddieh@google.com>
>> Cc: Vlad Dumitrescu <vladum@google.com>
>> Cc: Xiaotian Pei <xiaotian@google.com>
>> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
>> ---
>>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                    |  1 +
>>  net/core/filter.c                           | 21 ++++++++++++
>>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h              |  1 +
>>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 91c43884f295f60a85268ddf0020bf8aa47f8329..2940a9854f6d8e493518ca894e0c9c630ae4ab7a 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -2540,6 +2540,7 @@ struct __sk_buff {
>>  	__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_flow_keys *, flow_keys);
>>  	__u64 tstamp;
>>  	__u32 wire_len;
>> +	__u32 gso_segs;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct bpf_tunnel_key {
>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>> index 2b3b436ef5457bf44c99780d6dec0b5f403f005c..a6ff5d9a04cf06926ee75cbc523456d12baf25ae 100644
>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>> @@ -6700,6 +6700,27 @@ static u32 bpf_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
>>  							     target_size));
>>  		break;
>>  
>> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_segs):
>> +		/* si->dst_reg = skb_shinfo(SKB); */
>> +#ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
>> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, head),
>> +				      si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
>> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, head));
>> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, end),
>> +				      BPF_REG_TMP, si->src_reg,
>> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, end));
> I am not sure BPF_REG_TMP can be used for non-classic BPF.
> The earlier insn could be using BPF_REG_TMP (which is BPF_REG_2) and
> R2 would become loss after this BPF_LDX_MEM.

Yes, this will indeed corrupt R2 register. BPF_REG_TMP can only be used for
reg mapping out of classic BPF.

> Daniel, can BPF_REG_AX be used here as a tmp?

BPF_REG_AX would work in this case, yes. Neither of the above insns are used
in blinding nor would they collide with current verifier rewrites.

>> +		*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, si->dst_reg, BPF_REG_TMP);
>> +#else
>> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, end),
>> +				      si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
>> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, end));
>> +#endif
>> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct skb_shared_info, gso_segs),
>> +				      si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg,
>> +				      bpf_target_off(struct skb_shared_info,
>> +						     gso_segs, 2,
>> +						     target_size));
>> +		break;
>>  	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len):
>>  		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct qdisc_skb_cb, pkt_len) != 4);
>>  
>> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 91c43884f295f60a85268ddf0020bf8aa47f8329..2940a9854f6d8e493518ca894e0c9c630ae4ab7a 100644
>> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -2540,6 +2540,7 @@ struct __sk_buff {
>>  	__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_flow_keys *, flow_keys);
>>  	__u64 tstamp;
>>  	__u32 wire_len;
>> +	__u32 gso_segs;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct bpf_tunnel_key {
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
>> index 2fd90d4568926d13542783c870507d43a6d6bb64..2c46531044bdf9ec1e4fa47e2c94c9edb0ac3d08 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
>> @@ -5663,6 +5663,42 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
>>  		.result = ACCEPT,
>>  		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
>>  	},
>> +	{
>> +		"read gso_segs from CGROUP_SKB",
>> +		.insns = {
>> +			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
>> +				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_segs)),
>> +			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>> +			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>> +		},
>> +		.result = ACCEPT,
>> +		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		"write gso_segs from CGROUP_SKB",
>> +		.insns = {
>> +			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>> +			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
>> +				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_segs)),
>> +			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>> +			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>> +		},
>> +		.result = REJECT,
>> +		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
>> +		.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access off=164 size=4",
>> +		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		"read gso_segs from CLS",
>> +		.insns = {
>> +			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
>> +				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_segs)),
>> +			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>> +			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>> +		},
>> +		.result = ACCEPT,
>> +		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
>> +	},
>>  	{
>>  		"multiple registers share map_lookup_elem result",
>>  		.insns = {
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1.321.g9e740568ce-goog
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-17 23:31 [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field Eric Dumazet
2019-01-18 18:42 ` Martin Lau
2019-01-23 11:55   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2019-01-23 16:37     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ba606ff-34ee-6cb3-40e4-2d004b8689dd@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddieh@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladum@google.com \
    --cc=xiaotian@google.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox