From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Marcin_=A6lusarz?=" Subject: Re: [patch (take 2)] genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:07:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4bacf17f0708060007t7c849ff1p5dbb07c614789617@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070726081326.GA3197@ff.dom.local> <20070726083120.GA26910@elte.hu> <20070726085523.GA3423@ff.dom.local> <20070726091254.GA8063@elte.hu> <4bacf17f0707300029g5116e70bq4808059dc8b069f1@mail.gmail.com> <20070731155843.GA7033@elte.hu> <46B20E47.6020403@googlemail.com> <20070802201126.GA27000@elte.hu> <20070806060723.GA981@ff.dom.local> <20070806061459.GA26046@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jarek Poplawski" , "Gabriel C" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Jean-Baptiste Vignaud" , linux-kernel , shemminger , linux-net , netdev , "Andrew Morton" , "Alan Cox" To: "Ingo Molnar" Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:40866 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754292AbXHFHH4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:07:56 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1689927wah for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:07:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070806061459.GA26046@elte.hu> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org 2007/8/6, Ingo Molnar : > > * Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > Subject: genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers > > > > After the "genirq: do not mask interrupts by default" patch interrupts > > should be disabled not immediately upon request, but after they > > happen. But, handle_simple_irq() and handle_fasteoi_irq() can skip > > this once or more if an irq is just serviced (IRQ_INPROGRESS), > > possibly disrupting a driver's work. > > nice fix. I think this is exactly the type of bug we were hoping to be > able to identify and fix, and it could explain the regression in its > entirety. The big question - does it fix Marcin's regression? I'll try this patch tomorrow. Marcin