From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Marcin_=A6lusarz?=" Subject: Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:43:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4bacf17f0708100343r950cf90kbf826e2afc826df5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070806070300.GA4509@elte.hu> <20070807082321.GB2120@ff.dom.local> <4bacf17f0708070237w19d184b3p7f74b53612edb9a6@mail.gmail.com> <20070807095246.GB3223@ff.dom.local> <20070807121339.GA3946@ff.dom.local> <4bacf17f0708080409t116b5c84ye60dff7da51d0fdf@mail.gmail.com> <20070808114243.GC2426@ff.dom.local> <20070809091919.GB2423@ff.dom.local> <4bacf17f0708092333n17e0ba19jf2c769531610868d@mail.gmail.com> <20070810071038.GA1764@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Jean-Baptiste Vignaud" , linux-kernel , shemminger , linux-net , netdev , "Andrew Morton" , "Alan Cox" To: "Jarek Poplawski" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070810071038.GA1764@ff.dom.local> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org 2007/8/10, Jarek Poplawski : > (..) > I think, there is this one possible for your testing yet?: > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200 I think I already tested this patch, but this thread is sooo big and I can't find my response... > If it's not a great problem it would be interesting to try this with > different CONFIG_HZ too e.g. you could start with 100 (I guess, you > tested very similar thing in 2.6.23-rc2 with 1000(?) already). My all tests were done on 2.6.22.1 Marcin