From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
Misbah Anjum N <misanjum@linux.ibm.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 10:45:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bb9ed6b-1a64-406a-9239-b0560ca963cc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76a10e49-54a6-4813-8b58-b7cd0820fdc6@app.fastmail.com>
Hello Chuck,
在 2026/5/8 0:12, Chuck Lever 写道:
> Hello Erkun -
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2026, at 11:09 AM, yangerkun wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2026/5/1 22:51, Chuck Lever 写道:
>>> Misbah Anjum reported a use-after-free in cache_check_rcu()
>>> reached through e_show() while sosreport was reading
>>> /proc/fs/nfsd/exports on ppc64le. Two fixes for that report
>>> landed in v7.0:
>>>
>>> 48db892356d6 ("NFSD: Defer sub-object cleanup in export put callbacks")
>>> e7fcf179b82d ("NFSD: Hold net reference for the lifetime of /proc/fs/nfs/exports fd")
>>
>> Back to the problem fixed by this patches, I'm a little confused why
>> this UAF can be trigged.
>>
>> Before this patches, svc_export_put show as follow:
>>
>> 368 static void svc_export_put(struct kref *ref)
>> 369 {
>> 370 struct svc_export *exp = container_of(ref, struct
>> svc_export, h.ref);
>> 371
>> 372 path_put(&exp->ex_path);
>> 373 auth_domain_put(exp->ex_client);
>> 374 call_rcu(&exp->ex_rcu, svc_export_release);
>> 375 }
>>
>> The auth_domain_put function releases ->name using call_rcu, and
>> path_put may release the dentry also via call_rcu. All of this seems to
>> prevent e_show from causing a UAF. Could you point out which line in
>> d_path triggers the issue?
>
> The dentry, the mount, and the auth_domain ->name buffer all
> end up RCU-freed (dentry_free() and delayed_free_vfsmnt in
> fs/, svcauth_unix_domain_release_rcu() in svcauth_unix.c).
> The eventual kfree isn't the problem.
>
> The problem is the synchronous teardown inside path_put(),
> which runs before svc_export_put() ever reaches its own
> call_rcu():
>
> path_put(&exp->ex_path)
> -> dput(dentry)
> -> __dentry_kill() [if last ref]
> -> __d_drop() /* unhashes */
> -> dentry_unlink_inode() /* d_inode = NULL */
> -> d_op->d_release() if set
> -> drops parent d_lockref /* may cascade up */
> -> dentry_free() /* call_rcu deferred */
> -> mntput(mnt) /* deferred via task_work */
>
> The dentry pointer itself is RCU-safe, so prepend_path()'s walk
> of d_parent and d_name doesn't read freed memory. But by the
> time the reader gets there, __d_clear_type_and_inode() has
> already stored NULL into d_inode, __d_drop() has broken the
> hash linkage, and the parent's d_lockref has been decremented
> -- which can in turn fire __dentry_kill() on the parent, and
> on up the tree. An e_show() that's still inside its cache RCU
> read section walks into that half-dismantled state through
> seq_path(), and that's the NULL deref Misbah reported.
Thank you for your detailed explanation! Yes, e_show might be called
when the state is partially dismantled, but after carefully reviewing
the code with dput up to __dentry_kill, I still cannot find anything
that could cause this issue. Additionally, the comments for prepend_path
indicate that they have already taken into account that the dentry can
be removed concurrently. I have also run some tests on my arm64 QEMU,
but I couldn't reproduce the problem either. Could you please help me
identify the specific line or pointer in the dentry that triggers this
use-after-free or null pointer issue?
Maybe I am not be very familiar with the code, which caused me to fail
to identify the real root cause. I'm so sorry for that.
265 char *d_path(const struct path *path, char *buf, int buflen)
266 {
267 DECLARE_BUFFER(b, buf, buflen);
268 struct path root;
269
270 /*
271 * We have various synthetic filesystems that never get
mounted. On
272 * these filesystems dentries are never used for lookup
purposes, and
273 * thus don't need to be hashed. They also don't need a
name until a
274 * user wants to identify the object in /proc/pid/fd/. The
little hack
275 * below allows us to generate a name for these objects on
demand:
276 *
277 * Some pseudo inodes are mountable. When they are mounted
278 * path->dentry == path->mnt->mnt_root. In that case don't
call d_dname
279 * and instead have d_path return the mounted path.
280 */
281 if (path->dentry->d_op && path->dentry->d_op->d_dname &&
282 (!IS_ROOT(path->dentry) || path->dentry !=
path->mnt->mnt_root))
283 return path->dentry->d_op->d_dname(path->dentry,
buf, buflen);
284
285 rcu_read_lock();
286 get_fs_root_rcu(current->fs, &root);
287 if (unlikely(d_unlinked(path->dentry)))
288 prepend(&b, " (deleted)", 11);
289 else
290 prepend_char(&b, 0);
291 prepend_path(path, &root, &b);
292 rcu_read_unlock();
293
294 return extract_string(&b);
295 }
>
> The earlier fix (2530766492ec, "nfsd: fix UAF when access
> ex_uuid or ex_stats") moved the kfree of ex_uuid and ex_stats
> into svc_export_release() so those are RCU-safe now.
> path_put() and auth_domain_put() couldn't go in there because
> both may sleep, and call_rcu callbacks run in softirq context.
> This series uses queue_rcu_work() instead: it defers past the
> grace period AND runs the callback in process context, so the
> sleeping puts move into the deferred path and the window
> closes.
Yeah, I can get this! Thanks again for your detail explanation!
Thanks,
Erkun.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 14:51 [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: Move cache_initialize() declaration to sunrpc-private header Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: Provide a shared workqueue for cache release callbacks Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] SUNRPC: Defer ip_map sub-object cleanup past RCU grace period Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] SUNRPC: Use shared release pattern for the unix_gid cache Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] SUNRPC: Hold cd->net for the lifetime of cache files Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFSD: Convert nfsd_export_shutdown() to sunrpc_cache_destroy_net() Chuck Lever
2026-05-05 5:32 ` [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files Jeff Layton
2026-05-05 10:49 ` Calum Mackay
2026-05-05 10:53 ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-07 9:09 ` yangerkun
2026-05-07 16:12 ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-08 2:45 ` yangerkun [this message]
2026-05-08 3:08 ` yangerkun
2026-05-08 8:16 ` yangerkun
2026-05-08 13:00 ` yangerkun
2026-05-08 20:47 ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-09 9:41 ` yangerkun
2026-05-10 16:18 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4bb9ed6b-1a64-406a-9239-b0560ca963cc@huawei.com \
--to=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=misanjum@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox