From: "Taedcke, Christian" <christian.taedcke-oss@weidmueller.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
christian.taedcke@weidmueller.com
Cc: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Kevin Hao" <haokexin@gmail.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Robert Hancock" <robert.hancock@calian.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: macb: reprogram TBQP after shuffling the TX ring on link-up
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 15:36:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c0570d2-5018-4389-ab63-5f829cc41f32@weidmueller.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706150422.-wYiCBuE@linutronix.de>
Thank you for the quick review! This is my first Linux kernel
contribution, so I appreciate your feedback here.
On 7/6/2026 5:04 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2026-07-06 16:02:14 [+0200], Christian Taedcke via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Christian Taedcke <christian.taedcke@weidmueller.com>
>>
>> gem_shuffle_tx_one_ring() rotates the software TX ring so that the
>> tail sits at index 0 and resets queue->tx_tail to 0, but it never
>> reprograms the hardware transmit buffer queue pointer (TBQP). Other
>> paths that reset tx_tail to the ring base (macb_init_buffers() and
>> macb_tx_error_task()) also reprogram TBQP to queue->tx_ring_dma; this
>> path does not, leaving TBQP pointing at a stale descriptor.
>>
>> gem_shuffle_tx_rings() runs on every link-up from
>> macb_mac_link_up(). After a few link up/down flaps that leave
>> un-completed descriptors in the ring, the stale TBQP keeps pointing at
>> a descriptor whose used bit is set. When TX is re-enabled on link-up,
>> the GEM reads that used descriptor and raises TXUBR. macb_interrupt()
>> schedules the TX NAPI, macb_tx_poll() makes no progress (work_done ==
>> 0) and macb_tx_restart() re-issues TSTART, which makes the controller
>> read the same used descriptor again and re-assert TXUBR. As the MAC
>> interrupt is level-triggered, it never deasserts and one CPU is pegged
>> at 100% in the threaded handler, eventually triggering "sched: RT
>> throttling activated" and a dead network interface.
>
> But this should also happen with !RT at which point the interrupt runs
> at 100% CPU and the softirq has hardly an chance to make progress, no?
Problably yes. I had issues reproducing the issue since it appeared only
on specific test setups when a lot packets where sent to another network
device and this device's power was cut. And even then on some test runs
the issue was not visible after a few hundred iterations. But after a
restart of the whole test setup (including cold reboot of all devices)
the issue sometimes appeared after 5 iterations.
I only metion RT here because it was the only thing i tested. I only ran
the RT kernel.
Should I change the description?
>
>> Fix it by reprogramming TBQP to the ring base on every path of
>> gem_shuffle_tx_one_ring() that resets tx_tail to 0, mirroring
>> macb_tx_error_task(). The early return for an already-aligned tail is
>> left untouched as TBQP is already consistent there. This is safe
>> because the shuffle runs from macb_mac_link_up() while TE is still
>> disabled, so the transmitter is halted.
>>
>> Fixes: 881a0263d502 ("net: macb: Shuffle the tx ring before enabling tx")
>
> This is v7.0-rc4. So that RT tree of yours has some backports or did you
> run into this while trying to reproduce it upstream?
There were some backports. I ran this on the linux-yocto kernel
https://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto branch
v6.6/standard/preempt-rt/base.
The "Fixes:" commit was backported as 0a47c3889fcd before their version
of 6.6.130.
The kernel i reproduced the issue on was linux-yocto branch
v6.6/standard/preempt-rt/base after 6.6.142 was merged into it.
>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Taedcke <christian.taedcke@weidmueller.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> index fd282a1700fb..b11cb8f068b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static void gem_shuffle_tx_one_ring(struct macb_queue *queue)
>> if (!count) {
>> queue->tx_head = 0;
>> queue->tx_tail = 0;
>> - goto unlock;
>> + goto reset_hw_ptr;
>
> This update is even needed for count == 0 case? I kind of do understand
> that you need to updated if you shuffled the descriptors around.
This was my understanding before researching more because of the email
from Kevin in this thread: count == 0 may happen anywhere within the ring
(e.g. when both the tail and the head point to the middle).
Resetting queue->tx_tail to 0 but not resetting TBQP results in them
being out-of-sync.
But as Kevin mentioned in his email TBQP is reset to the original
value when transmit is disabled (by setting bit 3 in NCR register).
I will investigate this further why my code change fixed the issue for
me, but according to the documentation in [1] it should be a no-op.
[1] https://docs.amd.com/v/u/en-US/ug1085-zynq-ultrascale-trm pg. 1040
>
>> }
>>
>> shift = tail % ring_size;
>> @@ -869,6 +869,13 @@ static void gem_shuffle_tx_one_ring(struct macb_queue *queue)
>> /* Make descriptor updates visible to hardware */
>> wmb();
>>
>> +reset_hw_ptr:
>> + /* tx_tail was reset to the ring base, so TBQP must be reprogrammed
>> + * to match; otherwise it keeps pointing at a stale descriptor. Safe
>> + * to write directly here as TX is still disabled (called from
>> + * macb_mac_link_up() before TE is set).
>> + */
>> + queue_writel(queue, TBQP, lower_32_bits(queue->tx_ring_dma));
>> unlock:
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->tx_ptr_lock, flags);
>> }
>>
>
> Sebastian
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 14:02 [PATCH net 0/2] net: macb: fix TXUBR interrupt storm on link flapping Christian Taedcke via B4 Relay
2026-07-06 14:02 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: macb: reprogram TBQP after shuffling the TX ring on link-up Christian Taedcke via B4 Relay
2026-07-06 15:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-07 13:36 ` Taedcke, Christian [this message]
2026-07-07 9:13 ` Kevin Hao
2026-07-07 14:29 ` Taedcke, Christian
2026-07-08 3:05 ` Kevin Hao
2026-07-06 14:02 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: macb: mask TXUBR during TX NAPI poll to prevent IRQ storms Christian Taedcke via B4 Relay
2026-07-06 15:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-07 13:41 ` Taedcke, Christian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c0570d2-5018-4389-ab63-5f829cc41f32@weidmueller.com \
--to=christian.taedcke-oss@weidmueller.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=christian.taedcke@weidmueller.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hancock@calian.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox