Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
To: fubar@us.ibm.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] bonding: reread information about speed and duplex when interface goes up
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:19:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ca4b87e.NzbQ35P2qRrA2iuz%ole@ans.pl> (raw)

>From 43285224a785e90c7d4cff2be0766ca8df6ddfb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:09:02 +0200
Subject: bonding: reread information about speed and duplex when interface goes up

When an interface was enslaved when it was down, bonding thinks
it has speed -1 even after it goes up. This leads into selecting
a wrong active interface in active/backup mode on mixed 10G/1G or
1G/100M environment.

before:
 bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth5, 100 Mbps full duplex.
 bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth0, 100 Mbps full duplex.

after:
 bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth5, 10000 Mbps full duplex.
 bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth0, 1000 Mbps full duplex.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>

---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 721abc4..e409c14 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2368,6 +2368,8 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
 				slave->state = BOND_STATE_BACKUP;
 			}
 
+			bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
+
 			pr_info("%s: link status definitely up for interface %s, %d Mbps %s duplex.\n",
 				bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name,
 				slave->speed, slave->duplex ? "full" : "half");
-- 
1.7.1


             reply	other threads:[~2010-09-30 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-30 16:19 Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki [this message]
2010-10-06 21:28 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] bonding: reread information about speed and duplex when interface goes up David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ca4b87e.NzbQ35P2qRrA2iuz%ole@ans.pl \
    --to=ole@ans.pl \
    --cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox