Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] mlx4: convert to ndo_hwtstamp API

[Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>]

On 20/10/2025 11:11, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17/10/2025 21:21, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> Convert driver to use .ndo_hwtstamp_get()/.ndo_hwtstamp_set() callbacks.
>> mlx4_en_ioctl() becomes empty, remove it.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c    | 61 ++++++++-----------
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h  |  6 +-
>>   2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c b/drivers/ 
>> net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
>> index 308b4458e0d4..514f29f241c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
>> @@ -2420,21 +2420,21 @@ static int mlx4_en_change_mtu(struct 
>> net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>> -static int mlx4_en_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq 
>> *ifr)
>> +static int mlx4_en_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *dev,
>> +                struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
>> +                struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>   {
>>       struct mlx4_en_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>       struct mlx4_en_dev *mdev = priv->mdev;
>> -    struct hwtstamp_config config;
>> -
>> -    if (copy_from_user(&config, ifr->ifr_data, sizeof(config)))
>> -        return -EFAULT;
>>       /* device doesn't support time stamping */
>> -    if (!(mdev->dev->caps.flags2 & MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG2_TS))
>> +    if (!(mdev->dev->caps.flags2 & MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG2_TS)) {
>> +        NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "device doesn't support time stamping");
> 
> Encouraged to add more extack messages, for error flows below.
> WDYT?
It may potentially be a follow up work, but I decided to keep -ERANGE as
is because it's kinda self explanatory and is consistent across all the
drivers, while EINVAL is bit outlier and needs a bit more explanation.