From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nambiar, Amritha" Subject: Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v3 2/2] man: tc-flower: Add explanation for range option Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:16:19 -0800 Message-ID: <4d387af2-1b73-435b-d4ac-6b1969f2bd66@intel.com> References: <154232971379.10668.16416943966699679792.stgit@anamhost.jf.intel.com> <154232971889.10668.16009642596079446767.stgit@anamhost.jf.intel.com> <1c2cee31-af86-e285-c9d9-09a3105daa4b@gmail.com> <3000d314-2217-b2e6-230c-c9b41f173f2f@intel.com> <2192286d-01ff-dea2-1699-defe72f64a95@gmail.com> <8426219f-7024-1030-01ce-8daecbaa097b@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us To: David Ahern , stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:52334 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725995AbeKUPtO (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:49:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8426219f-7024-1030-01ce-8daecbaa097b@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/20/2018 8:59 PM, David Ahern wrote: > On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote: >> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing >> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch >> that was accepted removing the 'range' keyword? > > I think so. Consistency across commands is a good thing. > Okay, will do. I'll also combine the 'man patch' into 'flower patch' and make a single patch as Jiri recommended.