From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" Subject: Re: [1/9] pohmelfs: documentation. Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:19:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30812281419y4d40a78fha3eb7bc05e55e8ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <1230301130-1325-1-git-send-email-zbe@ioremap.net> <1230301130-1325-2-git-send-email-zbe@ioremap.net> <20081226192219.GB1761@ucw.cz> <20081228134155.GB858@ioremap.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Pavel Machek" , "Evgeniy Polyakov" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pohmelfs@ioremap.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "Evgeniy Polyakov" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081228134155.GB858@ioremap.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 12/28/08, Evgeniy Polyakov > >> > + * Very high performance. Evgeniy, Performance seems to be the most important argument in favour of pohmelfs. You should probably add more performance data in the cover letter of the patch serie. All the information are already available but not easy to be reached. In short, try to do a better work in "selling" your product :-) Ciao, -- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/ http://mypage.vodafone.it/