From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6838C4338F for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447F60E97 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245016AbhHFKQ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 06:16:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56824 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244773AbhHFKQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 06:16:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B437C061798; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 03:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id k4so10436036wrc.0; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:16:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=in-reply-to:to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ow/YCifQJGCqqdbMI3qwBTpDZquMwyp33IWsPkh/PBk=; b=SCGPwxQ6KgkiYy5MzVMWte93J3GhGS0pJpxCILWPJYqM9CVJfJcNEYdhe+Fa946bwf /QcpMwzY5VVNPjUzfBCL8vgaN7RDHvCzuCUksogEahUKF5Yp2H2sLmTsLzc7CAdxtN/9 17vPe5rrl9EAbwuVejV68rz+kQK5WD0OjmADECeDOsMyVESHuzupIvUfz973BXqYhqV4 mRy9o/pOzhRHZWY8KFMGYMFnxhGj0/MXjUIhATdrN1aAf2iEhn5d6ERGEeqrUwB+fR1x HYI83rzvM8qMImZOiHbe/q/DS3yUxoGIp4GxawwPFQb6MvdnEpo0mvCJoxuNRCgZJHa8 a5Ww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:in-reply-to:to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ow/YCifQJGCqqdbMI3qwBTpDZquMwyp33IWsPkh/PBk=; b=f6JT+77CBLPxbkN+RGj+7ytxKJYY+oY+KbuYwq91GzrusnlVeFlw3FbgvpfyQhZVLJ IifiegEH5flyacuV6ilmlx1MQIVG2cPCL+q/Vx4j8NSPgKTfE20k1voHmTLgv2HQaeHt zHHa3PD55zqqOkhBwc6m7+MVjsH8zw0dc/R8lIxtsqyuVT+9+RE53PeThUk8+4UyjMr0 pZvC3PL7j6OXuW3H/XRuzay3FGSXB7eDQW+1jngrOWrlZQEkOfZZFIYiN8S0KLCY0Gu0 HMfYaQLTDR7vhCh6wAtx4Wxeujv5rPdlFLuWWYxVZ0eyiLcnOUPkqhjGpEB4vFONKO91 e7tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lhZ5eWr9F2y5OsoFqEw3f7bazlGTvlbF/nbvD+0XLgLPdrWI5 2oEO72trLBuota1qfrJJMDE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbkvbgiTRgY5IR0dovVLsrUIQhDeHx8JeQV7DNUG5VSTN/HhalGtbn44s/F/jw8PZO1ebkzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6102:: with SMTP id v2mr9565416wrt.223.1628244987322; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (105.72.60.188.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch. [188.60.72.105]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z3sm11726983wmf.6.2021.08.06.03.16.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:16:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20190208132954.28166-1-andrejs.cainikovs@netmodule.com> To: ezequiel@collabora.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org From: Andrejs Cainikovs Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] D_CAN RX buffer size improvements Message-ID: <4da667f3-899a-459c-2cca-6514135a1918@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 12:16:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Ezequiel, Sorry for a late reply. I'm the author of this patch set, and I will have a look at this after I obtain the hardware. I hope this is still relevant. Best regards, Andrejs. > Hi everyone, > > This series was recently brought to my attention, in connection to a long-standing packet drop issue that we had on a Sitara-based product. > > I haven't tested this personally, but I've been notified that this was backported to the v4.19 kernel, and the packet drop was fixed. > > It seems the series never managed to get upstreamed, but I think this should be resurrected and merged (probably with after some cleanup/review). > > Thanks, > Ezequiel