From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0CBE224E3 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 13:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=6wind.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=6wind.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=6wind.com header.i=@6wind.com header.b="Yuc/5jBY" Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3374d309eebso383201f8f.3 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:51:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; t=1704376270; x=1704981070; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :cc:to:content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/Hu9wd786rx12aT/oHaTbS5ETRw/tZeb3iQfhejwi4Q=; b=Yuc/5jBYzSJiT8os/wiHV/ghhAyV8w+Dpj6vXefQahYnuvRF0AvIKHs6dT8NbkbSDq Mkv8DewF/z2Yvbzvh/YUPa0Lawsc91Hzlo1AZoORBXDgjHntB/b9M2XrRHwgj2SAH54K Kf0zJJnLvMwxArvvLJQZPyK3xpfUoM90S+mfcnwFQhpsaK6FruXOCHAN+9+nmqdyNK+i ONq9heGnJGmA0LjLF2SioFWu7fyq9hR9IF5n7INhJw0aC2vj7EZPCqPXagC0k47OvvXN rflawQ2SYHogsUE9jauascINFx0ZGA8K2l+ThgkOLDHyMBMHnUrECv/lOUn6UykV5FJ2 oX4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704376270; x=1704981070; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :cc:to:content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=/Hu9wd786rx12aT/oHaTbS5ETRw/tZeb3iQfhejwi4Q=; b=tth9iJ0S10QZtFuak+PkzShrb510h4+UyQPRjkXFt4ALTkmrlQFVzw8ICfXF0MtbQT NvFKuMLbJxisV3sYZWWTv9yc5h3Gh00FzA1iOMKrMx356sPAp9078YpHA/1maEyxFs7N 1gc1ka9yGb2O9HQt3hJo92xQcY8Mj4d98Wj9axEyhWNzAdLJ6Zo1R4TTKybBU9qw/y7c Cdd4cXY4YCNwI7YC/WEupCw/QKCqzYoy+Xkyu9K+6V5DXkrUcD/N8RClFkE/k+CIMmTD NSMYXuNB43c5kjd5pHTh8NnPdruQbzprYI5F9HSNXvfFrsbDgxFlsvqXmkCEnXe22tK1 kPiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzC3P+69yEKGIq7cE73tVaZRyDFggPuBbO1G2T+oxFeDU0qIvj1 8J5XIyWYfAgsBepg2v3E5mguNkE4sRVMXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE7e958b8FjvDSmG6a5JCgdMoo2Ay28rzJusdTZlXygfYyLernAqcK/0brIr8hiq8vW8bD9Cg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e282:0:b0:337:9e8:f578 with SMTP id v2-20020adfe282000000b0033709e8f578mr342464wri.37.1704376269884; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:51:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a01:e0a:b41:c160:1b61:be9c:86ee:5963? ([2a01:e0a:b41:c160:1b61:be9c:86ee:5963]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e17-20020a5d5311000000b0033672cfca96sm32882289wrv.89.2024.01.04.05.51.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:51:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4e1d5b11-6fec-4ee2-a091-479e480476be@6wind.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:51:08 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: check enslaving iface in a bond Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Hangbin Liu , "David S . Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Phil Sutter , David Ahern , netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20240103094846.2397083-1-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <20240103094846.2397083-3-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <0aa87eb2-b50d-4ae8-81ce-af7a52813e6a@6wind.com> <20240103132120.2cace255@kernel.org> From: Nicolas Dichtel Organization: 6WIND In-Reply-To: <20240103132120.2cace255@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 03/01/2024 à 22:21, Jakub Kicinski a écrit : > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:15:33 +0100 Nicolas Dichtel wrote: >>> The net-next added new function setup_ns in lib.sh and converted all hard code >>> netns setup. I think It may be good to post this patch set to net-next >>> to reduce future merge conflicts. >> >> The first patch is for net. I can post the second one to net-next if it eases >> the merge. >> >>> Jakub, Paolo, please correct me if we can't post fixes to net-next. >> >> Please, let me know if I should target net-next for the second patch. > > Looks like the patch applies to net-next, so hopefully there won't > be any actual conflicts. But it'd be good to follow up and refactor > it in net-next once net gets merged in. As long as I'm not missing > anything - up to you - I'm fine with either sending the test to > net-next like Hangbin suggests, or following up in net-next to use > setup_ns. I will send a follow-up once net gets merged in net-next. Thank you, Nicolas