From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F392EEC5 for ; Thu, 23 May 2024 00:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716423151; cv=none; b=BAZ1xRTihlrKkhO5Y0DL3U7udp1JbTy5YqN7eRhm5FFhOfWDRMsqCZw1gBucun5/Kr42GdwXBpY5g6GSmaR3IQZxB57R9qj7nG9x8q4KZd6HLpkP2hAEy3X8li+TGODufcqvgR1+mIn3S6uiBp3rjyXyUGqch3X7qJaZG0JHZi0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716423151; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ANkRUb1bwAgrDs4zvhPe0qOdkmBs0EVy6YlfAI2fat0=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=Ml4Mss47nd8usLzY6gmuDYa/LCSBcNHu0X+XpH/gaR4Q6PpjpbUaEtWujVcryZZA/zaW2Se8lcWmp5BNjj6HbeV2ebWTofI9/f8TNmdoGcOsELOVGGWhf5kTjEasE/a4WYqL1mPt8ig3R561zy3EX7lC2HmloFTyYPNWdROkcmA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=iWxO1/Bl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="iWxO1/Bl" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1716423145; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=orhR3mD5suZMwD6x94iKkyggewrD7PVZIqFS8QUYtHI=; b=iWxO1/Bl4KtvV+Vtw+G+L2RiYd1n0Y7L8+FbBtTsHoSLndn+JE6Rc/xYXnVRIUbPjRGpX5 p797bZsXzfRJaKZh21DhIrHGfoKAeOePwMtZBwhNSXvs7nP+tvNL/9QtTVPKkdimOGRi+u 2v5FhwNzqKuIG7uOBOjM1acy6Z9zEm5t5m2qCfNlci5EGG1IvyMh35xpL4K0qtUwB3GMU/ NG+BFuTl+KEypAsVM5U+VtVBltwIfPEjbRmsRYq2Md9IStNEFAPt0yY53bwTqLUjlhiCn0 RDR4JV5HSy05Qv5LYj/SQ5Kq868QBWakduGEtGsFRX7Xl0CGbGZaeJCG8Epdcw== Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 02:12:25 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Gedalya Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [resend] color: default to dark background In-Reply-To: <005513fa-85ce-4e9f-a357-e1d42944410d@gedalya.net> References: <20240522135721.7da9b30c@hermes.local> <67841f35-a2bb-49a5-becd-db2defe4e4fa@gedalya.net> <2866a9935b3fa3eafe51625b5bdfaa30@manjaro.org> <20240522143354.0214e054@hermes.local> <5b8dfe40-e72e-4310-85b5-aa607bad1638@gedalya.net> <20240522155234.6180d92d@hermes.local> <005513fa-85ce-4e9f-a357-e1d42944410d@gedalya.net> Message-ID: <4e20a39f1796682b7637a010becc2527@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2024-05-23 01:41, Gedalya wrote: > On 5/23/24 6:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> Overall, I am concerned that changing this will upset existing users. >> Not that it is impossible, just need more consensus and testing. > > Turns out people were complaining about it years ago, not realizing > that > the color scheme they were looking at was actually not meant for dark > backgrounds: > > https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/kae9qa/comment/gfgew0x/ That's what I also wondered about after enabling the color support for the first time, which wasn't very unusable with dark background. After a bit of reading, I got it all configured properly.