From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
"Coco Li" <lixiaoyan@google.com>, "Wei Wang" <weiwan@google.com>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
mark.rutland@arm.com,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net 0/3] Report RCU QS for busy network kthreads
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:30:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e251463-8cfb-4cc6-b9b6-ce1dcd7c7052@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1710877680.git.yan@cloudflare.com>
On 19/03/2024 21.44, Yan Zhai wrote:
> This changeset fixes a common problem for busy networking kthreads.
> These threads, e.g. NAPI threads, typically will do:
>
> * polling a batch of packets
> * if there are more work, call cond_resched() to allow scheduling
> * continue to poll more packets when rx queue is not empty
>
> We observed this being a problem in production, since it can block RCU
> tasks from making progress under heavy load. Investigation indicates
> that just calling cond_resched() is insufficient for RCU tasks to reach
> quiescent states. This also has the side effect of frequently clearing
> the TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag on voluntary preempt kernels. As a result,
> schedule() will not be called in these circumstances, despite schedule()
> in fact provides required quiescent states. This at least affects NAPI
> threads, napi_busy_loop, and also cpumap kthread.
>
> By reporting RCU QSes in these kthreads periodically before cond_resched, the
> blocked RCU waiters can correctly progress. Instead of just reporting QS for
> RCU tasks, these code share the same concern as noted in the commit
> d28139c4e967 ("rcu: Apply RCU-bh QSes to RCU-sched and RCU-preempt when safe").
> So report a consolidated QS for safety.
>
> It is worth noting that, although this problem is reproducible in
> napi_busy_loop, it only shows up when setting the polling interval to as high
> as 2ms, which is far larger than recommended 50us-100us in the documentation.
> So napi_busy_loop is left untouched.
>
> Lastly, this does not affect RT kernels, which does not enter the scheduler
> through cond_resched(). Without the mentioned side effect, schedule() will
> be called time by time, and clear the RCU task holdouts.
>
> V4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1710525524.git.yan@cloudflare.com/
> V3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240314145459.7b3aedf1@kernel.org/t/
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZeFPz4D121TgvCje@debian.debian/
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zd4DXTyCf17lcTfq@debian.debian/#t
>
> changes since v4:
> * polished comments and docs for the RCU helper as Paul McKenney suggested
>
> changes since v3:
> * fixed kernel-doc errors
>
> changes since v2:
> * created a helper in rcu header to abstract the behavior
> * fixed cpumap kthread in addition
>
> changes since v1:
> * disable preemption first as Paul McKenney suggested
>
> Yan Zhai (3):
> rcu: add a helper to report consolidated flavor QS
> net: report RCU QS on threaded NAPI repolling
> bpf: report RCU QS in cpumap kthread
>
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 3 +++
> net/core/dev.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-19 20:44 [PATCH v5 net 0/3] Report RCU QS for busy network kthreads Yan Zhai
2024-03-19 20:44 ` [PATCH v5 net 1/3] rcu: add a helper to report consolidated flavor QS Yan Zhai
2024-03-19 21:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-19 22:00 ` Yan Zhai
2024-03-19 22:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-22 11:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-22 21:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-23 2:02 ` Yan Zhai
2024-03-23 23:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-05 13:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 18:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-19 20:44 ` [PATCH v5 net 2/3] net: report RCU QS on threaded NAPI repolling Yan Zhai
2024-03-19 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-19 20:44 ` [PATCH v5 net 3/3] bpf: report RCU QS in cpumap kthread Yan Zhai
2024-03-19 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-20 10:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2024-03-21 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 net 0/3] Report RCU QS for busy network kthreads patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e251463-8cfb-4cc6-b9b6-ce1dcd7c7052@kernel.org \
--to=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=yan@cloudflare.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).