From: "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: add support for bridge port isolation
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 09:52:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4eaf2bcb-4fad-4211-a48e-079a5c2a6767@arinc9.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15263cb9bbc63d5cc66428e7438e0b5324306aa4.1718400508.git.mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
On 15/06/2024 01:21, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> Remove a pair of ports from the port matrix when both ports have the
> isolated flag set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index ecacaefdd694..44939379aba8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -1303,7 +1303,8 @@ mt7530_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u8 state)
> }
>
> static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port,
> - const struct net_device *bridge_dev, bool join)
> + const struct net_device *bridge_dev,
> + bool join)
Run git clang-format on this patch as well please.
> __must_hold(&priv->reg_mutex)
> {
> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(priv->ds, port), *other_dp;
> @@ -1311,6 +1312,7 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port,
> struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dp->cpu_dp;
> u32 port_bitmap = BIT(cpu_dp->index);
> int other_port;
> + bool isolated;
>
> dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(other_dp, priv->ds) {
> other_port = other_dp->index;
> @@ -1327,7 +1329,9 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port,
> if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_dev(other_dp, bridge_dev))
> continue;
>
> - if (join) {
> + isolated = p->isolated && other_p->isolated;
> +
> + if (join && !isolated) {
> other_p->pm |= PCR_MATRIX(BIT(port));
> port_bitmap |= BIT(other_port);
> } else {
Why must other_p->isolated be true as well? If I understand correctly, when
a user port is isolated, non isolated ports can't communicate with it
whilst the CPU port can. If I were to isolate a port which is the only
isolated one at the moment, the isolated flag would not be true. Therefore,
the isolated port would not be removed from the port matrix of other user
ports. Why not only check for p->isolated?
Arınç
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-16 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-14 22:21 [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: mt7530: factor out bridge join/leave logic Matthias Schiffer
2024-06-14 22:21 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: add support for bridge port isolation Matthias Schiffer
2024-06-16 6:52 ` Arınç ÜNAL [this message]
2024-06-16 7:02 ` Arınç ÜNAL
2024-06-16 8:39 ` Matthias Schiffer
2024-06-16 15:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-16 16:35 ` Matthias Schiffer
2024-06-16 6:49 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: mt7530: factor out bridge join/leave logic Arınç ÜNAL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4eaf2bcb-4fad-4211-a48e-079a5c2a6767@arinc9.com \
--to=arinc.unal@arinc9.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mschiffer@universe-factory.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox