From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bob Beers" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 - rev2] Add new timeval_to_sec function Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:58:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4f6ba3b0708210258k779ff97x87edbb4ace091d0e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070820134536.d260585a.varunc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070820075325.43bd8f60@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net> <46CA5E75.9050904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Stephen Hemminger" , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, socketcan@hartkopp.net, krkumar2@in.ibm.com, varuncha@in.ibm.com To: "Varun Chandramohan" Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.188]:46449 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752090AbXHUJ67 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:58:59 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1169614rvb for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:58:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46CA5E75.9050904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org What if the name of the function was more descriptive of what the function actually does? Maybe timeval_ceil_sec()?