Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Stefano Munari <stefanomunari.sm@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Thangaraj Samynathan <Thangaraj.S@microchip.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Nisar Sayed <Nisar.Sayed@microchip.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: usb: lan78xx: reject invalid EEPROM write requests
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:28:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fbcbf4e3caf264ee5abef2275e02cfb@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc1a471e-ba76-4fe5-a982-0cbe1775c915@lunn.ch>

On 9.10.2026 03:27, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 02:57:02AM +0200, Stefano Munari wrote:
>> The runtime PM handling removed the -EINVAL return for invalid
>> EEPROM/OTP write requests. These requests now return zero from a
>> successful usb_autopm_get_interface() call, even though no data is
>> written.
>> 
>> Set ret to -EINVAL for invalid requests while preserving the runtime
>> PM reference release.
>> 
>> Fixes: 8a7ffeb795f8 ("lan78xx: Fix for eeprom read/write when device 
>> auto suspend")
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Munari <stefanomunari.sm@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Tested on a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ with the onboard Ethernet
>> controller, using raspberrypi/linux commit bba53a117a4a on the
>> rpi-6.6.y branch as the baseline.
>> 
>>   ethtool -E eth0 magic 0 offset 0 length 1 value 0
>> 
>> The command succeeds without the patch and reports "Invalid argument"
>> with the patch applied.
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> index 5655941f1478..7ac263454d45 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> @@ -1719,6 +1719,8 @@ static int lan78xx_ethtool_set_eeprom(struct 
>> net_device *netdev,
>>  		 (ee->len == 512) &&
>>  		 (data[0] == OTP_INDICATOR_1))
>>  		ret = lan78xx_write_raw_otp(dev, ee->offset, ee->len, data);
>> +	else
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> It might be the nested if's without {} which caused the broken patch?
> 
> Maybe add some brackets to make it clearer?
> 
>       Andrew

8a7ffeb795f8 dropped the final return -EINVAL when it converted the
returns to ret = ..., braces wouldn't have caught that. Fine with
adding them for a v2 though.

In either case:

Reviewed-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
Tested-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de> # Raspberry Pi 3B+ 
(LAN7515)

Thanks,
Nicolai

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09  0:57 [PATCH net] net: usb: lan78xx: reject invalid EEPROM write requests Stefano Munari
2026-10-09  1:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-09  8:28   ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4fbcbf4e3caf264ee5abef2275e02cfb@tipi-net.de \
    --to=nb@tipi-net.de \
    --cc=Nisar.Sayed@microchip.com \
    --cc=Thangaraj.S@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanomunari.sm@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox