From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 05:02:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50038580.20299907.1486634551103.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Eric Dumazet , LKML , Cong Wang , netdev , syzkaller To: Dmitry Vyukov Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > Hello, > > I've got the following report while running syzkaller fuzzer on mmotm > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git) > remotes/mmotm/auto-latest ee4ba7533626ba7bf2f8b992266467ac9fdc045e: > [...] > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock); > local_irq_disable(); > lock(&(&r->producer_lock)->rlock); > lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock); > > lock(&(&r->producer_lock)->rlock); > Thanks a lot for the testing. Looks like we could address this by using skb_array_consume_bh() instead. Could you pls verify if the following patch works? diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index 8a7d6b9..a97c00d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) { struct sk_buff *skb; - while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) + while ((skb = skb_array_consume_bh(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) kfree_skb(skb); skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue); @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file *tfile, int noblock, struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; int error = 0; - skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array); + skb = skb_array_consume_bh(&tfile->tx_array); if (skb) goto out; if (noblock) { @@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file *tfile, int noblock, current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; while (1) { - skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array); + skb = skb_array_consume_bh(&tfile->tx_array); if (skb) break; if (signal_pending(current)) {