public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tcp: Limit number of segments generated by GSO per skb
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:23:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5016C305.7080907@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343668602.2667.6.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>

On 07/30/2012 10:16 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> A peer (or local user) may cause TCP to use a nominal MSS of as little
> as 88 (actual MSS of 76 with timestamps).  Given that we have a
> sufficiently prodigious local sender and the peer ACKs quickly enough,
> it is nevertheless possible to grow the window for such a connection
> to the point that we will try to send just under 64K at once.  This
> results in a single skb that expands to 861 segments.
>
> In some drivers with TSO support, such an skb will require hundreds of
> DMA descriptors; a substantial fraction of a TX ring or even more than
> a full ring.  The TX queue selected for the skb may stall and trigger
> the TX watchdog repeatedly (since the problem skb will be retried
> after the TX reset).  This particularly affects sfc, for which the
> issue is designated as CVE-2012-3412.  However it may be that some
> hardware or firmware also fails to handle such an extreme TSO request
> correctly.
>
> Therefore, limit the number of segments per skb to 100.  This should
> make no difference to behaviour unless the actual MSS is less than
> about 700.

Please do not do this...or at least allow over-rides.  We love
the trick of seting very small MSS and making the NICs generate
huge numbers of small TCP frames with efficient user-space
logic.   We use this for stateful TCP load testing when high
numbers of tcp packets-per-second is desired.

Intel NICs, including 10G, work just fine with minimal MSS
in this scenario.

Thanks,
Ben



-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-30 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-30 17:14 [PATCH net 0/2] Prevent extreme TSO parameters from stalling TX queues Ben Hutchings
2012-07-30 17:16 ` [PATCH net 1/2] tcp: Limit number of segments generated by GSO per skb Ben Hutchings
2012-07-30 17:23   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-07-30 19:41     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-07-30 21:00       ` Ben Greear
2012-07-30 17:31   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-30 19:35     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-07-30 19:56       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-07-30 21:46       ` David Miller
2012-07-30 22:20         ` Ben Hutchings
2012-07-30 22:50           ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-07-30 23:07             ` Ben Hutchings
2012-07-30 17:17 ` [PATCH net 2/2] sfc: Correct the minimum TX queue size Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5016C305.7080907@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox