netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
	Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2 1/1] net: phy: fix invalid phy id when probe using C22
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:48:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50224899-4abe-5874-7ea5-bde66bbe1d18@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c921bf7f-e4d1-eefa-c5ae-024d5e8a4845@gmail.com>

On 18.03.2021 17:02, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/18/2021 6:25 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 18.03.2021 10:09, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
>>> When using Clause-22 to probe for PHY devices such as the Marvell
>>> 88E2110, PHY ID with value 0 is read from the MII PHYID registers
>>> which caused the PHY framework failed to attach the Marvell PHY
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Fixed this by adding a check of PHY ID equals to all zeroes.
>>>
>>
>> I was wondering whether we have, and may break, use cases where a PHY,
>> for whatever reason, reports PHY ID 0, but works with the genphy
>> driver. And indeed in swphy_read_reg() we return PHY ID 0, therefore
>> the patch may break the fixed phy.
>> Having said that I think your patch is ok, but we need a change of
>> the PHY ID reported by swphy_read_reg() first.
>> At a first glance changing the PHY ID to 0x00000001 in swphy_read_reg()
>> should be sufficient. This value shouldn't collide with any real world
>> PHY ID.
> 
> It most likely would not, but it could be considered an ABI breakage,
> unless we filter out what we report to user-space via SIOGCMIIREG and
> /sys/class/mdio_bus/*/*/phy_id
> 
> Ideally we would have assigned an unique PHY OUI to the fixed PHY but
> that would have required registering Linux as a vendor, and the process
> is not entirely clear to me about how to go about doing that.
> --

In the OUI list I found entry 58-9C-FC, belonging to FreeBSD Foundation.
Not sure what they use it for, but it seems adding Linux as a vendor
wouldn't be a total exception.

> Florian
> 
Heiner

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-18 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18  9:09 [PATCH net V2 1/1] net: phy: fix invalid phy id when probe using C22 Wong Vee Khee
2021-03-18 13:25 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-03-18 16:02   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-18 16:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-03-18 16:48     ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2021-03-18 18:14     ` Greg KH
2021-03-18 18:58       ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-19  7:40 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-03-19  8:56   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-03-22 12:39     ` Wong, Vee Khee
2021-03-26  1:57 ` [net] c0da0048be: WARNING:at_net/core/devlink.c:#devlink_port_type_warn kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50224899-4abe-5874-7ea5-bde66bbe1d18@gmail.com \
    --to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vee.khee.wong@intel.com \
    --cc=weifeng.voon@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).