From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vlad Yasevich Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] sctp: network namespace support Part 2: per net tunables Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:07:12 -0400 Message-ID: <5023C410.9030708@gmail.com> References: <87mx27rig7.fsf@xmission.com> <87zk67q31q.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <87ipcud3ld.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <20120808.232058.1128673474849407813.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jan.ariyasu@hp.com, jan.ariyasu@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, tgraf@infradead.org, xi.wang@gmail.com To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120808.232058.1128673474849407813.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 08/09/2012 02:20 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700 > >> Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much >> grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added >> tunable support on top of my last patchset. >> >> I have performed basic testing on the these patches and nothing >> appears amis. >> >> The sm statemachine is a major tease as it has all of these association >> and endpoint pointers in the common set of function parameters that turn >> out to be NULL at the most inconvinient times. So I added to the common >> parameter list a struct net pointer, that is never NULL. > > I like Eric's patch set and I'd like to apply it to net-next. > > Vlad? > I like these patches much more as well, but not done reviewing yet. I'll try to finish the review tonight -vlad