From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 0/5] cgroup: Assign subsystem IDs during compile time Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:37:52 -0700 Message-ID: <502D7640.1000703@intel.com> References: <1345126336-20755-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <20120816190542.GA8203@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <502D5737.1010604@monom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Neil Horman , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Daniel Wagner , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , Gao feng , Glauber Costa , Jamal Hadi Salim , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Li Zefan , Tejun Heo To: Daniel Wagner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <502D5737.1010604-kQCPcA+X3s7YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 8/16/2012 1:25 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On 08/16/2012 09:05 PM, Neil Horman wrote: >>> Daniel Wagner (5): >>> cgroup: Use empty task_cls_classid() when !CONFIG_NET_CLS(_MODULE) >>> cgroup: Move sock_update_classid() decleration to cls_cgroup.h >>> cgroup: Protect access to task_cls_classid() when built as module >>> cgroup: Protect access to task_netprioidx() when built as module >>> cgroup: Assign subsystem IDs during compile time >> >> The series seems reasonable. I presume you've testing building and running both >> net_prio and net_cls as modules and monolithically? >> Neil > > Yep, I spend a good bit of time rebuilding and testing all patches in > the different configuration. I hope I really got the small semantic > differences between net_cls and net_prio regarding the loading and > unloading correct. So please have a close look at the jump label > patches (#3 and #4). > > BTW, I have a few mores on top of these patches, e.g. merging the > builtin and module version of task_cls_classid()/task_netprioidx() > implementation together and getting rid of the many ifdefs in the > header. But let's first get this part reviewed. > > thanks, > daniel > Also I have another series for netprio against net-next to clean up some of the locking as suggested by Al Viro. I'll wait to submit those until after this series has been reviewed/applied. In the meantime I'll apply these to my local tree and test these.