From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm:Use rcu_dereference_bh to deference pointer protected
 by rcu_read_lock_bh
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:36:20 +0800
Message-ID: <502DE664.9060207@windriver.com>
References: <1345184349-5849-1-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com> <20120816.232414.545877018277576779.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:51281 "EHLO
	mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753871Ab2HQGfj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:35:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120816.232414.545877018277576779.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>



On 2012=E5=B9=B408=E6=9C=8817=E6=97=A5 14:24, David Miller wrote:
>
> I already applied your patch, as I told you here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D134517122805719&w=3D2
>
> This means you are submitting a patch which doesn't not even apply
> to the net-next tree.
>
> Instead of continuing to dig yourself deeper and deeper, take a
> break, take a deep breath, and work slowly and carefully.
>

OK, thanks for your kind guidance :)

--=20

Love each day!
--fan