From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
To: ML netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: stmmac mitigation and ethtool coalesce parameters
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503486B8.7080706@st.com> (raw)
Hello
I'm reworking the mitigation schema in the stmmac and removing the old
and dead STMMAC_TIMER code.
On new chips we have an HW RX-Watchdog that can be used for mitigating
the Rx-interrupts and first results look promising.
Before posting the patches I have a doubt about the ethtool coalesce
parameters to use in the driver to tune the following parameters:
- On Rx-side I have:
a parameter that is the RI Watchdog Timer count. It indicates the
number of system clock cycles.
- On Tx-side, the mitigation schema I'm using is based on a SW timer
that calls the tx function (stmmac_tx) to reclaim the resource after
transmitting the frames.
Also there is another parameter (like a threshold) used to program
the descriptors avoiding to set the interrupt on completion bit in
when the frame is sent (xmit). This means that the stmmac_tx can be
called by the ISR too. This approach is showing really good figures
as well.
so I wonder which are the appropriate ethtool coalesce parameters to
use? Or could I tune them by using sysfs entries?
Welcome advice.
Peppe
reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503486B8.7080706@st.com \
--to=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).