From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] cgroup: net_cls: Protect access to task_cls_classid() when built as module Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:56:29 +0200 Message-ID: <503903BD.6020208@monom.org> References: <1345816904-21745-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <1345816904-21745-4-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <20120824232621.GQ21325@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Gao feng , Jamal Hadi Salim , John Fastabend , Li Zefan , Neil Horman To: Tejun Heo Return-path: Received: from hotel311.server4you.de ([85.25.146.15]:41299 "EHLO hotel311.server4you.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753294Ab2HYQ4b (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:56:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120824232621.GQ21325@google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 25.08.2012 01:26, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:01:37PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: >> @@ -306,6 +312,11 @@ static void __exit exit_cgroup_cls(void) >> synchronize_rcu(); >> #endif >> >> +#if IS_MODULE(CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP) >> + static_key_slow_dec(&cgroup_cls_enabled); >> + rcu_barrier(); > > Why is this rcu_barrier() necessary? I have read the rcubarrier.txt document and I got from that that an rcu_barrier() is needed when unloading a module. But maybe I got it wrong. So the idea after disabling the jump lables all pending readers in task_cls_classid() have left. THe same thing is done in the old code with the dynamic id part. With the difference that synchronize_rcu() is used. > In general, please explain what > synchronization is going on when using sync constructs which aren't > obvious - e.g. memory barriers, rcu barriers. Sure, I will keep this in mind.