From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Subject: Re: Possible issue with Mellanox mlx4/port handling Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:16:53 -0300 Message-ID: <5044F415.4010605@redhat.com> References: <953B660C027164448AE903364AC447D28720CF7D@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <5044ECA9.5080100@redhat.com> <953B660C027164448AE903364AC447D28720CFEB@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> Reply-To: mleitner@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Or Gerlitz To: Yevgeny Petrilin Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32322 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754398Ab2ICSQ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:16:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <953B660C027164448AE903364AC447D28720CFEB@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/03/2012 02:51 PM, Yevgeny Petrilin wrote: >> If you can share, what can we expect it to be like? Like the chunk I suggested >> above or is there anything else needed? I could notice only 6 places calling >> get_promisc_qp() that way and couldn't find any other issue like that. >> > > The fix is pretty much the same style like what you suggested. Awesome. Thanks! Marcelo