From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:04:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048C984.3030306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346953229-3825-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
On 09/06/2012 01:40 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> dst stored in struct sctp_transport needs to be recalculated when ipsec policy
> are updated. We use flow_cache_genid for that.
>
> For example, if a SCTP connection is established and then an IPsec policy is
> set, the old SCTP flow will not be updated and thus will not use the new
> IPsec policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
why doesn't this need to be done for TCP? What makes SCTP special in
this case?
ip_queue_xmit does an __sk_dst_check() which is essentially what
sctp_transport_dst_check() does. That should determine if the currently
cached route is valid or not.
Looks like sctp may need to change to using ip_route_output_ports() call
as ip_route_output_key may not do all that is necessary
-vlad
> ---
> include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 3 ++-
> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++
> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 1 +
> net/sctp/protocol.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
> index 9c6414f..3267246 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
> @@ -712,7 +712,8 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr *addr)
> */
> static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct sctp_transport *t)
> {
> - if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
> + if ((t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) ||
> + (t->flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid))) {
> dst_release(t->dst);
> t->dst = NULL;
> }
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 0fef00f..9dab882 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -948,6 +948,9 @@ struct sctp_transport {
>
> /* 64-bit random number sent with heartbeat. */
> __u64 hb_nonce;
> +
> + /* used to check validity of dst */
> + __u32 flow_cache_genid;
> };
>
> struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_new(struct net *, const union sctp_addr *,
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> index ea14cb4..2ed7410 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> @@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ out:
> struct rt6_info *rt;
> rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
> t->dst = dst;
> + t->flow_cache_genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid);
> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
> &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &fl6->saddr);
> } else {
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index 2d51842..4795a1a 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ out_unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> out:
> t->dst = dst;
> + t->flow_cache_genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid);
> if (dst)
> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt_dst:%pI4, rt_src:%pI4\n",
> &fl4->daddr, &fl4->saddr);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 17:40 [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:04 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2012-09-06 16:40 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:03 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 12:24 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 13:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:20 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:13 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 12:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:21 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:56 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-12 7:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-17 16:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries David Miller
2012-09-17 18:14 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:25 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:52 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:54 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 20:08 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:34 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:43 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:44 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:38 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 17:18 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 18:01 ` David Miller
2012-09-22 16:49 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove rt6i_flow_cache_genid field in rt6_info Nicolas Dichtel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5048C984.3030306@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).