From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Cc: sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:03:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048D774.3020008@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5048D219.4020001@6wind.com>
On 09/06/2012 12:40 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 06/09/2012 18:04, Vlad Yasevich a écrit :
>> On 09/06/2012 01:40 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> dst stored in struct sctp_transport needs to be recalculated when
>>> ipsec policy
>>> are updated. We use flow_cache_genid for that.
>>>
>>> For example, if a SCTP connection is established and then an IPsec
>>> policy is
>>> set, the old SCTP flow will not be updated and thus will not use the new
>>> IPsec policy.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
>>
>> why doesn't this need to be done for TCP? What makes SCTP special in
>> this case?
> Tests prove that the pb does not exist with TCP. I made the patch some
> times ago, I will look again deeply to find the difference.
>
TCP appears to cache the flowi and uses that to re-route the packet.
However, re-route still seems predicated on dst_check()...
>>
>> ip_queue_xmit does an __sk_dst_check() which is essentially what
>> sctp_transport_dst_check() does. That should determine if the
>> currently cached
>> route is valid or not.
> The problem is that route will not be invalidated, because dst->check()
> has no xfrm path so xfrm_dst_check() will never be called.
>
Shouldn't the cache be invalidated in this case? If the cache is
invalidated, that should cause a new lookup. If the cache isn't
invalidated, then any established connections that may now be impacted
by the policy will not pick it up.
-vlad
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas
>
>>
>> Looks like sctp may need to change to using ip_route_output_ports() call
>> as ip_route_output_key may not do all that is necessary
>>
>> -vlad
>>
>>> ---
>>> include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 3 ++-
>>> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 +++
>>> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 1 +
>>> net/sctp/protocol.c | 1 +
>>> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>> index 9c6414f..3267246 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>> @@ -712,7 +712,8 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr
>>> *addr)
>>> */
>>> static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
>>> sctp_transport *t)
>>> {
>>> - if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
>>> + if ((t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) ||
>>> + (t->flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid))) {
>>> dst_release(t->dst);
>>> t->dst = NULL;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>>> index 0fef00f..9dab882 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>>> @@ -948,6 +948,9 @@ struct sctp_transport {
>>>
>>> /* 64-bit random number sent with heartbeat. */
>>> __u64 hb_nonce;
>>> +
>>> + /* used to check validity of dst */
>>> + __u32 flow_cache_genid;
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_new(struct net *, const union
>>> sctp_addr *,
>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>> index ea14cb4..2ed7410 100644
>>> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>> @@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ out:
>>> struct rt6_info *rt;
>>> rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
>>> t->dst = dst;
>>> + t->flow_cache_genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid);
>>> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
>>> &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &fl6->saddr);
>>> } else {
>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
>>> index 2d51842..4795a1a 100644
>>> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
>>> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
>>> @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ out_unlock:
>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>> out:
>>> t->dst = dst;
>>> + t->flow_cache_genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid);
>>> if (dst)
>>> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt_dst:%pI4, rt_src:%pI4\n",
>>> &fl4->daddr, &fl4->saddr);
>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 17:40 [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:04 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 16:40 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:03 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2012-09-07 12:24 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 13:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:20 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:13 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 12:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:21 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:56 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-12 7:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-17 16:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries David Miller
2012-09-17 18:14 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:25 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:52 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:54 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 20:08 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:34 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:43 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:44 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:38 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 17:18 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 18:01 ` David Miller
2012-09-22 16:49 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove rt6i_flow_cache_genid field in rt6_info Nicolas Dichtel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5048D774.3020008@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).