netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, sri@us.ibm.com,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:29:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504DF950.4010401@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347283338-4249-4-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>

On 09/10/2012 09:22 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> IPv6 dst should take care of rt_genid too. When a xfrm policy is inserted or
> deleted, all dst should be invalidated.
> To force the validation, dst entries should be created with ->obsolete set to
> DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK. This was already the case for all functions calling
> ip6_dst_alloc(), except for ip6_rt_copy().
>
> As a consequence, we can remove the specific code in inet6_connection_sock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
> ---
>   include/net/ip6_fib.h            |  2 +-
>   net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 23 +----------------------
>   net/ipv6/route.c                 | 17 +++++++++++++----
>   3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_fib.h b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> index cd64cf3..5eb93f4 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct rt6_info {
>   	unsigned long			_rt6i_peer;
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> -	u32				rt6i_flow_cache_genid;
> +	u32				rt6i_genid;
>   #endif
>   	/* more non-fragment space at head required */
>   	unsigned short			rt6i_nfheader_len;
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> index 0251a60..c4f9341 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> @@ -175,33 +175,12 @@ void __inet6_csk_dst_store(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst,
>   			   const struct in6_addr *saddr)
>   {
>   	__ip6_dst_store(sk, dst, daddr, saddr);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> -	{
> -		struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info  *)dst;
> -		rt->rt6i_flow_cache_genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid);
> -	}
> -#endif
>   }
>
>   static inline
>   struct dst_entry *__inet6_csk_dst_check(struct sock *sk, u32 cookie)
>   {
> -	struct dst_entry *dst;
> -
> -	dst = __sk_dst_check(sk, cookie);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> -	if (dst) {
> -		struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
> -		if (rt->rt6i_flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid)) {
> -			__sk_dst_reset(sk);
> -			dst = NULL;
> -		}
> -	}
> -#endif
> -
> -	return dst;
> +	return __sk_dst_check(sk, cookie);
>   }
>
>   static struct dst_entry *inet6_csk_route_socket(struct sock *sk,
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 339d921..db7b78f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -281,13 +281,16 @@ static inline struct rt6_info *ip6_dst_alloc(struct net *net,
>   					     struct fib6_table *table)
>   {
>   	struct rt6_info *rt = dst_alloc(&net->ipv6.ip6_dst_ops, dev,
> -					0, DST_OBSOLETE_NONE, flags);
> +					0, DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK, flags);
>
>   	if (rt) {
>   		struct dst_entry *dst = &rt->dst;
>
>   		memset(dst + 1, 0, sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(*dst));
>   		rt6_init_peer(rt, table ? &table->tb6_peers : net->ipv6.peers);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> +		rt->rt6i_genid = rt_genid(net);
> +#endif

This isn't XFRM dependent any more, is it?

-vlad

>   	}
>   	return rt;
>   }
> @@ -1031,6 +1034,15 @@ static struct dst_entry *ip6_dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
>
>   	rt = (struct rt6_info *) dst;
>
> +	/* All IPV6 dsts are created with ->obsolete set to the value
> +	 * DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK which forces validation calls down
> +	 * into this function always.
> +	 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> +	if (rt->rt6i_genid != rt_genid(dev_net(rt->dst.dev)))
> +		return NULL;
> +#endif
> +
>   	if (rt->rt6i_node && (rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum == cookie)) {
>   		if (rt->rt6i_peer_genid != rt6_peer_genid()) {
>   			if (!rt6_has_peer(rt))
> @@ -1397,8 +1409,6 @@ int ip6_route_add(struct fib6_config *cfg)
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>
> -	rt->dst.obsolete = -1;
> -
>   	if (cfg->fc_flags & RTF_EXPIRES)
>   		rt6_set_expires(rt, jiffies +
>   				clock_t_to_jiffies(cfg->fc_expires));
> @@ -2093,7 +2103,6 @@ struct rt6_info *addrconf_dst_alloc(struct inet6_dev *idev,
>   	rt->dst.input = ip6_input;
>   	rt->dst.output = ip6_output;
>   	rt->rt6i_idev = idev;
> -	rt->dst.obsolete = -1;
>
>   	rt->rt6i_flags = RTF_UP | RTF_NONEXTHOP;
>   	if (anycast)
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-06 17:40 [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:04 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 16:40   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:03     ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 12:24       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 13:47   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57     ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57       ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:20         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:35         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:47           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:13               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:21                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:48                   ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48                 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 12:47                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:10                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:22                   ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:21                       ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:56                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                           ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-12  7:40                               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-17 16:49                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries David Miller
2012-09-17 18:14                               ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:25                                 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:52                                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:54                                     ` David Miller
2012-09-18 20:08                                       ` David Miller
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:29                       ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2012-09-10 14:34                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:43                           ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:44                             ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:35                     ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:38                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 17:18                       ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:59                         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 18:01                           ` David Miller
2012-09-22 16:49                             ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-07 14:51           ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 15:08             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:57       ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove rt6i_flow_cache_genid field in rt6_info Nicolas Dichtel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504DF950.4010401@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).