From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, sri@us.ibm.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:29:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504DF950.4010401@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347283338-4249-4-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
On 09/10/2012 09:22 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> IPv6 dst should take care of rt_genid too. When a xfrm policy is inserted or
> deleted, all dst should be invalidated.
> To force the validation, dst entries should be created with ->obsolete set to
> DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK. This was already the case for all functions calling
> ip6_dst_alloc(), except for ip6_rt_copy().
>
> As a consequence, we can remove the specific code in inet6_connection_sock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip6_fib.h | 2 +-
> net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 23 +----------------------
> net/ipv6/route.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_fib.h b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> index cd64cf3..5eb93f4 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct rt6_info {
> unsigned long _rt6i_peer;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> - u32 rt6i_flow_cache_genid;
> + u32 rt6i_genid;
> #endif
> /* more non-fragment space at head required */
> unsigned short rt6i_nfheader_len;
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> index 0251a60..c4f9341 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> @@ -175,33 +175,12 @@ void __inet6_csk_dst_store(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst,
> const struct in6_addr *saddr)
> {
> __ip6_dst_store(sk, dst, daddr, saddr);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> - {
> - struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
> - rt->rt6i_flow_cache_genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid);
> - }
> -#endif
> }
>
> static inline
> struct dst_entry *__inet6_csk_dst_check(struct sock *sk, u32 cookie)
> {
> - struct dst_entry *dst;
> -
> - dst = __sk_dst_check(sk, cookie);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> - if (dst) {
> - struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
> - if (rt->rt6i_flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid)) {
> - __sk_dst_reset(sk);
> - dst = NULL;
> - }
> - }
> -#endif
> -
> - return dst;
> + return __sk_dst_check(sk, cookie);
> }
>
> static struct dst_entry *inet6_csk_route_socket(struct sock *sk,
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 339d921..db7b78f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -281,13 +281,16 @@ static inline struct rt6_info *ip6_dst_alloc(struct net *net,
> struct fib6_table *table)
> {
> struct rt6_info *rt = dst_alloc(&net->ipv6.ip6_dst_ops, dev,
> - 0, DST_OBSOLETE_NONE, flags);
> + 0, DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK, flags);
>
> if (rt) {
> struct dst_entry *dst = &rt->dst;
>
> memset(dst + 1, 0, sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(*dst));
> rt6_init_peer(rt, table ? &table->tb6_peers : net->ipv6.peers);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> + rt->rt6i_genid = rt_genid(net);
> +#endif
This isn't XFRM dependent any more, is it?
-vlad
> }
> return rt;
> }
> @@ -1031,6 +1034,15 @@ static struct dst_entry *ip6_dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
>
> rt = (struct rt6_info *) dst;
>
> + /* All IPV6 dsts are created with ->obsolete set to the value
> + * DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK which forces validation calls down
> + * into this function always.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> + if (rt->rt6i_genid != rt_genid(dev_net(rt->dst.dev)))
> + return NULL;
> +#endif
> +
> if (rt->rt6i_node && (rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum == cookie)) {
> if (rt->rt6i_peer_genid != rt6_peer_genid()) {
> if (!rt6_has_peer(rt))
> @@ -1397,8 +1409,6 @@ int ip6_route_add(struct fib6_config *cfg)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - rt->dst.obsolete = -1;
> -
> if (cfg->fc_flags & RTF_EXPIRES)
> rt6_set_expires(rt, jiffies +
> clock_t_to_jiffies(cfg->fc_expires));
> @@ -2093,7 +2103,6 @@ struct rt6_info *addrconf_dst_alloc(struct inet6_dev *idev,
> rt->dst.input = ip6_input;
> rt->dst.output = ip6_output;
> rt->rt6i_idev = idev;
> - rt->dst.obsolete = -1;
>
> rt->rt6i_flags = RTF_UP | RTF_NONEXTHOP;
> if (anycast)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 17:40 [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:04 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 16:40 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:03 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 12:24 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 13:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:20 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:13 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 12:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:21 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:56 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-12 7:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-17 16:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries David Miller
2012-09-17 18:14 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:25 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:52 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:54 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 20:08 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2012-09-10 14:34 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:43 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:44 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:38 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 17:18 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 18:01 ` David Miller
2012-09-22 16:49 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove rt6i_flow_cache_genid field in rt6_info Nicolas Dichtel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504DF950.4010401@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).