netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, sri@us.ibm.com,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:43:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504DFC9D.9010402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504DFA84.40409@6wind.com>

On 09/10/2012 10:34 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 10/09/2012 16:29, Vlad Yasevich a écrit :
>> On 09/10/2012 09:22 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> IPv6 dst should take care of rt_genid too. When a xfrm policy is
>>> inserted or
>>> deleted, all dst should be invalidated.
>>> To force the validation, dst entries should be created with
>>> ->obsolete set to
>>> DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK. This was already the case for all functions
>>> calling
>>> ip6_dst_alloc(), except for ip6_rt_copy().
>>>
>>> As a consequence, we can remove the specific code in
>>> inet6_connection_sock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
>>> ---
>>>   include/net/ip6_fib.h            |  2 +-
>>>   net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 23 +----------------------
>>>   net/ipv6/route.c                 | 17 +++++++++++++----
>>>   3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_fib.h b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
>>> index cd64cf3..5eb93f4 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
>>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct rt6_info {
>>>       unsigned long            _rt6i_peer;
>>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>>> -    u32                rt6i_flow_cache_genid;
>>> +    u32                rt6i_genid;
>>>   #endif
>>>       /* more non-fragment space at head required */
>>>       unsigned short            rt6i_nfheader_len;
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
>>> b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
>>> index 0251a60..c4f9341 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
>>> @@ -175,33 +175,12 @@ void __inet6_csk_dst_store(struct sock *sk, struct
>>> dst_entry *dst,
>>>                  const struct in6_addr *saddr)
>>>   {
>>>       __ip6_dst_store(sk, dst, daddr, saddr);
>>> -
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>>> -    {
>>> -        struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info  *)dst;
>>> -        rt->rt6i_flow_cache_genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid);
>>> -    }
>>> -#endif
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   static inline
>>>   struct dst_entry *__inet6_csk_dst_check(struct sock *sk, u32 cookie)
>>>   {
>>> -    struct dst_entry *dst;
>>> -
>>> -    dst = __sk_dst_check(sk, cookie);
>>> -
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>>> -    if (dst) {
>>> -        struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
>>> -        if (rt->rt6i_flow_cache_genid !=
>>> atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid)) {
>>> -            __sk_dst_reset(sk);
>>> -            dst = NULL;
>>> -        }
>>> -    }
>>> -#endif
>>> -
>>> -    return dst;
>>> +    return __sk_dst_check(sk, cookie);
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   static struct dst_entry *inet6_csk_route_socket(struct sock *sk,
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
>>> index 339d921..db7b78f 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
>>> @@ -281,13 +281,16 @@ static inline struct rt6_info
>>> *ip6_dst_alloc(struct net
>>> *net,
>>>                            struct fib6_table *table)
>>>   {
>>>       struct rt6_info *rt = dst_alloc(&net->ipv6.ip6_dst_ops, dev,
>>> -                    0, DST_OBSOLETE_NONE, flags);
>>> +                    0, DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK, flags);
>>>
>>>       if (rt) {
>>>           struct dst_entry *dst = &rt->dst;
>>>
>>>           memset(dst + 1, 0, sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(*dst));
>>>           rt6_init_peer(rt, table ? &table->tb6_peers :
>>> net->ipv6.peers);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>>> +        rt->rt6i_genid = rt_genid(net);
>>> +#endif
>>
>> This isn't XFRM dependent any more, is it?
> Not dependent, but for IPv6, it's only usefull when xfrm is set. Goal of
> this ifdef was to avoid the test if xfrm is not used.

It's not the usage,  it's enable at build time and that's almost always 
on.  Now the cache behavior is different when XFRM is excluded from the 
kernel build.

Before the ifdef was needed since you were actually looking at xfrm 
variable.  Not anymore.   The ifdef doesn't make sense.

-vlad

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-06 17:40 [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:04 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 16:40   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:03     ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 12:24       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 13:47   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57     ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57       ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:20         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:35         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:47           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:13               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:21                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:48                   ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48                 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 12:47                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:10                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:22                   ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:21                       ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:56                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                           ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-12  7:40                               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-17 16:49                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries David Miller
2012-09-17 18:14                               ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:25                                 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:52                                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:54                                     ` David Miller
2012-09-18 20:08                                       ` David Miller
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:29                       ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:34                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:43                           ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2012-09-10 14:44                             ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:35                     ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:38                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 17:18                       ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:59                         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 18:01                           ` David Miller
2012-09-22 16:49                             ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-07 14:51           ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 15:08             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:57       ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove rt6i_flow_cache_genid field in rt6_info Nicolas Dichtel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504DFC9D.9010402@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).