From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@mellanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: mlx4: dropping multicast packets at promisc leave
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:04:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505B3088.7090908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505B1874.3040904@mellanox.com>
On 09/20/2012 10:21 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 20/09/2012 03:43, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>> I have a report that our mlx4 driver (RHEL 6.3) is dropping multicast
>> packets when NIC leaves promisc mode. It seems this is being cause due
>> to the new steering mode that took place near by commit
>> 1679200f91da6a054b06954c9bd3eeed29b6731f. As it seems, the new
>> steering mode needs more commands/time to leave the promisc mode,
>> which may be leading to packet drops.
>
> Marcelo,
>
> The commit you point on below 6d19993 "net/mlx4_en: Re-design multicast
> attachments flow" makes sure to avoid
> doing extra firmware comments and not leave a window in time where
> "correct" addresses are not attached. Its hard to say what's the case on
> that RHEL 6.3 system, it would be very helpful through if you manage to
> reproduce the problem on an upstream kernel -- BTW you didn't say on
Okay, I understand that the commit prevents a window. I may be missing
something, but isn't there another one in there? Between:
mlx4_SET_MCAST_FLTR MLX4_MCAST_DISABLE and
mlx4_SET_MCAST_FLTR MLX4_MCAST_ENABLE
because mlx4_multicast_promisc_remove() was called just before those.
Otherwise I don't how is the NIC would be receiving multicast packets in
there.
I understand the difficulty about the kernel version, I am sorry for
that. As I'm unable to reproduce the issue by myself, I couldn't run a
test in a plain upstream kernel so far or experiment much.
I was holding this email: I just access to a server that seems to
reproduce the issue. It has a MT27500 ConnectX-3 NIC. Only tried our
RHEL 6.3 stock so far. Keep you posted on further tests!
This was the result of ifconfig mlx4_2 -promisc:
[ 3] 34.0-35.0 sec 61.7 MBytes 517 Mbits/sec 0.024 ms 274/43502
(0.63%)
[ 3] 34.0-35.0 sec 756 datagrams received out-of-order
> which kernel you are trying to reproduce this, note that upstream has
> also commit 60d31c1475f2 "net/mlx4_core: Looking for promiscuous entries
> on the correct port" (reported by you...) , so if somehow this commit
> makes the diff you could use it also on their system.
Sorry, that would be 2.6.32-279.el6. It has additional commits up to
somewhere near commit
58a3de0 - mlx4_core: fix race on comm channel
but maybe not all before that one. Can't tell you for sure.
And then I tried 3 additional patches applied at once:
- 60d31c1475f2 "net/mlx4_core: Looking for promiscuous entries on the
correct port"
- f1f75f0 - mlx4: attach multicast with correct flag
- Yes, this one wasn't in 2.6.32-279.el6.
- 6d19993 - net/mlx4_en: Re-design multicast attachments flow
And they still reported drops.
>> It takes 300ms to perform the change there against my 600us. Hitting
>> something like tcpdump -c 10 in a loop helps triggering it.
>
> Do you have any insight for this huge difference?
No idea. Couldn't track it yet.
Thanks,
Marcelo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-20 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 0:43 mlx4: dropping multicast packets at promisc leave Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2012-09-20 13:21 ` Or Gerlitz
2012-09-20 15:04 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2012-09-21 18:32 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2012-09-27 20:37 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2012-09-27 20:45 ` Or Gerlitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505B3088.7090908@redhat.com \
--to=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=yevgenyp@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).