From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net-tcp: TCP/IP stack bypass for loopback connections Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:24:36 -0700 Message-ID: <505B5154.3020002@hp.com> References: <1347908305-13541-1-git-send-email-brutus@google.com> <1347913239.26523.173.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120919.163406.487082174277409074.davem@davemloft.net> <1348088634.31352.26.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <505AFDE9.4080602@earthlink.net> <1348141871.31352.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sclark46@earthlink.net, Bruce Curtis , David Miller , edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:46149 "EHLO g1t0026.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751615Ab2ITRYh (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:24:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1348141871.31352.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/20/2012 04:51 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 07:28 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: >> >> Does this mean traffic on the loopback interface will not traverse >> netfilter? >> > > Yes this was already mentioned. > > Only the SYN / SYNACK messages will > > All data will bypass IP stack, qdisc (if any), loopback driver, and > netfilter. Does that then lift the tent flap for TOE? As I recall, TOE's bypassing of all those things is one of the reasons used to reject TOE. rick jones