From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: use bigger pages in __netdev_alloc_frag
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:36:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50632F06.1040306@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348676085.5093.361.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 09/26/2012 09:14 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 09:00 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> One minor thought. Instead of tracking offset and size why not just
>> work from the top down instead of the bottom up?
>>
>> So instead of starting with the frag offset at 0, why not start it at
>> PAGE_SIZE << order, and then work your way down to 0. That way you
>> don't need to track both size and offset.
>>
> How do you refill then ?
>
> (ie setting xxx->offset back to PAGE_SIZE << order)
>
> I am not sure we have direct access to a page order given a struct page
> pointer.
>
> I also like struct page_frag abstraction, because it might allow us
> better code factorization with other frag allocators.
>
> ( skb_append_datato_frags(), sk_page_frag_refill(), ...)
I forgot about the page recycling portion of it. I was still thinking
of the original implementation that had a fixed page order. You are
correct, with the page order being dynamic you will have to store size
somewhere.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-26 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-26 9:06 [PATCH net-next] net: use bigger pages in __netdev_alloc_frag Eric Dumazet
2012-09-26 13:11 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-09-26 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-26 16:00 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-09-26 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-26 16:36 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2012-09-26 16:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Eric Dumazet
2012-09-27 23:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50632F06.1040306@intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).