From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:53:34 +0200 Message-ID: <506C192E.5060700@redhat.com> References: <87vces2gxq.fsf__45058.6618776017$1349247807$gmane$org@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Thomas Lendacky , avi@redhat.com To: Rusty Russell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vces2gxq.fsf__45058.6618776017$1349247807$gmane$org@rustcorp.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Il 03/10/2012 08:44, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my > implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite > number of them, for each bug in each device. However, this bug affects (almost) all implementations and (almost) all devices. It even makes sense to reserve a transport feature bit for it instead of a device feature bit. Paolo