From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: nic_swsd@realtek.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
hayeswang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: r8169 delay / segfault
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:06:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50806F42.9070505@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121014213224.GA23396@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
On 14/10/12 23:32, Francois Romieu wrote:
>> How can we force the device out of D3 power state?
>>
>> I also compared with kernel 3.5, and it seems like a regression to me,
>> With 3.5, it works and tells on resume:
>
> Can you try both a 3.5 kernel with the 3.6 r8169 driver and a 3.6 kernel
> with the 3.5 r8169 driver ?
Sorry for the delay.
What makes the whole thing difficult is that on vanilla 3.6, the problem
happens always, while with vanilla 3.5 it also happens but much less
often - about every 10th suspend / resume cycle.
To test the 3.5 r8169 driver with a 3.6 kernel, and vice versa, I copied
over the r8169.c file, respectively.
The result is that the 3.6 kernel with the "old" driver shows the same
issue as the vanilla 3.6. On 3.5 I also see the same thing happen as
before - every 10th suspend / resume cycle the problem happens,
independent of the "old" or "new" driver.
So the difference comes from the kernel, but finally it is present
anyway. Maybe it is just triggered more efficiently in 3.6? ;-)
Remember that I don't encountered problems with other drivers'
suspend/resume, only with the r8169.
Thanks for considering. Please tell me how I can help further on this issue.
Roland
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-12 19:35 r8169 delay / segfault Roland Stigge
2012-10-12 21:05 ` Francois Romieu
2012-10-12 22:14 ` Roland Stigge
2012-10-13 9:59 ` Roland Stigge
2012-10-14 21:32 ` Francois Romieu
2012-10-18 21:06 ` Roland Stigge [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50806F42.9070505@antcom.de \
--to=stigge@antcom.de \
--cc=hayeswang@realtek.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).