From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:20:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50851DF4.7050704@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121021.204351.350463326482954461.davem@davemloft.net>
On 10/22/2012 04:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:55:56 +0400
>
>> The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
>> cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
>> socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
>> hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
>>
>> That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
>> to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
>> getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
>>
>> Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
>> info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
>
> Applied. I can't believe we didn't support this when the feature
> was added.
>
> I guess we figured that if the application made this setting, then
> it knows and doesn't need to query it.
> .
AFAIS such decision (application that configures something knows what it is) was
made for many things. The same is true at least for the SO_ATTACH_FILTER option
and for the shutdown syscall. Both add something to a socket that cannot be queried
back. And I'm now thinking which way for getting one would be better.
Thanks,
Pavel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 9:55 [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-19 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 0:43 ` David Miller
2012-10-22 10:20 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2012-10-22 18:04 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:28 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:23 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:10 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:20 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 21:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:47 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 21:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:58 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-23 21:43 ` Brian Haley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50851DF4.7050704@parallels.com \
--to=xemul@parallels.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).