From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, maxk@qualcomm.com,
haixiao@juniper.net, ernesto.martin@viasat.com,
krkumar2@in.ibm.com, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 0/7] Multiqueue support in tuntap
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:07:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5092039C.60009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121030165249.4cc4d596@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
On 10/31/2012 07:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I am testing BQL for tuntap.
> It wouldn't be hard to do BQL in the multi-queue version.
Yes, if BQL for tuntap is in first, I will rebase and convert it to
multiqueue version.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-01 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 5:35 [net-next v4 0/7] Multiqueue support in tuntap Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:35 ` [PATCH] tuntap: choose the txq based on rxq Jason Wang
2012-10-29 6:03 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:35 ` [net-next v4 1/7] tuntap: log the unsigned informaiton with %u Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:35 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:35 ` [net-next v4 2/7] tuntap: move socket to tun_file Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:35 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` [net-next v4 3/7] tuntap: RCUify dereferencing between tun_struct and tun_file Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` [net-next v4 4/7] tuntap: introduce multiqueue flags Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` [net-next v4 5/7] tuntap: multiqueue support Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` [net-next v4 6/7] tuntap: add ioctl to attach or detach a file form tuntap device Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` [net-next v4 7/7] tuntap: choose the txq based on rxq Jason Wang
2012-10-29 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-29 6:07 ` [net-next v4 0/7] Multiqueue support in tuntap David Miller
2012-10-29 6:16 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-30 23:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-01 5:07 ` Jason Wang [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-29 5:35 Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5092039C.60009@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ernesto.martin@viasat.com \
--cc=haixiao@juniper.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).