From: Shan Wei <shanwei88@gmail.com>
To: cl@linux-foundation.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel-Maillist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shan Wei <shanwei88@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/9 v2] use efficient this_cpu_* helper
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:03:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5093EEC2.7000109@gmail.com> (raw)
this_cpu_ptr is faster than per_cpu_ptr(p, smp_processor_id())
and can reduce memory accesses.
The latter helper needs to find the offset for current cpu,
and needs more assembler instructions which objdump shows in following.
per_cpu_ptr(p, smp_processor_id()):
1e: 65 8b 04 25 00 00 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%eax
26: 48 98 cltq
28: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi
2a: 48 c7 c7 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%rdi
31: 48 8b 04 c5 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(,%rax,8),%rax
39: c7 44 10 04 14 00 00 00 movl $0x14,0x4(%rax,%rdx,1)
this_cpu_ptr(p)
1e: 65 48 03 14 25 00 00 00 00 add %gs:0x0,%rdx
27: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi
29: c7 42 04 14 00 00 00 movl $0x14,0x4(%rdx)
30: 48 c7 c7 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%rdi
Changelog V2:
1. Use this_cpu_read directly instead of ref to field of per-cpu variable.
2. Patch5 about ftrace is dropped from this series.
3. Add new patch9 to replace get_cpu;per_cpu_ptr;put_cpu with this_cpu_add opt.
4. For preemption disable case, use __this_cpu_read instead.
$ git diff --stat b77bc2069d1e437d5a1a71bb5cfcf4556ee40015
drivers/clocksource/arm_generic.c | 2 +-
kernel/padata.c | 5 ++---
kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +-
kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 2 +-
kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 +---
net/batman-adv/main.h | 4 +---
net/core/flow.c | 4 +---
net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 4 ++--
net/openvswitch/vport.c | 5 ++---
net/rds/ib_recv.c | 2 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c | 7 +++----
11 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-02 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-02 16:03 Shan Wei [this message]
2012-11-02 17:49 ` [PATCH 0/9 v2] use efficient this_cpu_* helper Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-02 16:01 Shan Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5093EEC2.7000109@gmail.com \
--to=shanwei88@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).