From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next] ipv6/multipath: remove flag NLM_F_EXCL after the first nexthop Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:30:06 +0100 Message-ID: <5097790E.1080701@6wind.com> References: <50896D47.7030500@6wind.com> <1351846702-4982-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <20121102.213857.2276553238313329445.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com, bernat@luffy.cx, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:39428 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032Ab2KEIaK (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 03:30:10 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hr7so2846374wib.1 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:30:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121102.213857.2276553238313329445.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 03/11/2012 02:38, David Miller a =E9crit : > From: Nicolas Dichtel > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 09:58:22 +0100 > >> fib6_add_rt2node() will reject the nexthop if this flag is set, so >> we perform the check only for the first nexthop. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel > > It seems a bit hackish, but I don't have any better ideas, so > applied, thanks. > Yes, I agree. It's why I didn't include it in the initial patch ... but= I also=20 didn't find a better way :/