From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix alloc_skb_resources on -ENOMEM cleanup path
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 17:37:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509BD19F.4080905@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509BBFCF.20109@windriver.com>
On 11/8/2012 4:21 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 12-11-08 08:40 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
>> Should gfar_init_bds() return with -ENOMEM inside gfar_alloc_skb_resources(),
>> free_skb_resources() will be called twice in a row on the "cleanup" path,
>> leading to duplicate kfree() calls for rx_|tx_queue->rx_|tx_skbuff resulting
>> in segmentation fault.
>> This patch prevents the segmentation fault to happen in the future
>> (rx_|tx_sbkbuff set to NULL), and corrects the error path handling
>> for gfar_init_bds().
>
> Since gfar_init_bds is more like a slave routine to gfar_alloc_skb_resources,
> I think the dup free_skb_resources should remain in the parent, and be removed
> from gfar_init_bds. Otherwise the gfar_alloc_skb_resources will appear
> confusing -- one will think it it allocates some resources, hits a failure
> and then returns without bothering to do any cleanup of the parts it
> did manage to allocate. (Then gfar_restore will have to call the free
> itself _if_ gfar_init_bds fails too.)
>
> Paul.
You're right. I'll send the v1 patch shortly.
Thanks.
Claudiu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-08 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-08 13:40 [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix alloc_skb_resources on -ENOMEM cleanup path Claudiu Manoil
2012-11-08 14:21 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-11-08 15:37 ` Claudiu Manoil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509BD19F.4080905@freescale.com \
--to=claudiu.manoil@freescale.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).