* [PATCH] bonding: make arp_ip_target parameter checks consistent with sysfs
@ 2012-11-24 12:21 Nikolay Aleksandrov
2012-11-28 16:23 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2012-11-24 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: andy, fubar, davem
The module can be loaded with arp_ip_target="255.255.255.255" which makes it
impossible to remove as the function in sysfs checks for that value, so we make
the parameter checks consistent with sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 5f5b69f..940eac8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -4706,12 +4706,14 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
arp_ip_count++) {
/* not complete check, but should be good enough to
catch mistakes */
- if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])) {
+ __be32 ip = in_aton(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count]);
+ if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])
+ || ip == 0
+ || ip == htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST)) {
pr_warning("Warning: bad arp_ip_target module parameter (%s), ARP monitoring will not be performed\n",
arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count]);
arp_interval = 0;
} else {
- __be32 ip = in_aton(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count]);
arp_target[arp_ip_count] = ip;
}
}
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding: make arp_ip_target parameter checks consistent with sysfs
2012-11-24 12:21 [PATCH] bonding: make arp_ip_target parameter checks consistent with sysfs Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2012-11-28 16:23 ` David Miller
2012-11-28 16:33 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-11-28 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nikolay; +Cc: netdev, andy, fubar
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:21:15 +0100
> @@ -4706,12 +4706,14 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
> arp_ip_count++) {
> /* not complete check, but should be good enough to
> catch mistakes */
> - if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])) {
> + __be32 ip = in_aton(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count]);
> + if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])
> + || ip == 0
> + || ip == htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST)) {
Please format this properly, put the connecting operators at the end,
not the beginning, of the lines of the if statement, like so:
if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0]) ||
ip == 0 ||
ip == htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST)) {
Where else did you see the layout you used? It's not a prevalent
construct, so as far as I can tell you came up with it on your own.
Please don't do this, and instead use existing practice as your guide.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding: make arp_ip_target parameter checks consistent with sysfs
2012-11-28 16:23 ` David Miller
@ 2012-11-28 16:33 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2012-11-28 17:34 ` Bjørn Mork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2012-11-28 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev, andy, fubar
Actually I did see it from kernel/module.c and didn't come up with it
myself.
Anyway I will re-post with the change and will take a note for the future.
Thanks for the review
On 28/11/12 17:23, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov<nikolay@redhat.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:21:15 +0100
>
>> @@ -4706,12 +4706,14 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
>> arp_ip_count++) {
>> /* not complete check, but should be good enough to
>> catch mistakes */
>> - if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])) {
>> + __be32 ip = in_aton(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count]);
>> + if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])
>> + || ip == 0
>> + || ip == htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST)) {
> Please format this properly, put the connecting operators at the end,
> not the beginning, of the lines of the if statement, like so:
>
> if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0]) ||
> ip == 0 ||
> ip == htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST)) {
>
> Where else did you see the layout you used? It's not a prevalent
> construct, so as far as I can tell you came up with it on your own.
>
> Please don't do this, and instead use existing practice as your guide.
>
> Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding: make arp_ip_target parameter checks consistent with sysfs
2012-11-28 16:33 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2012-11-28 17:34 ` Bjørn Mork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bjørn Mork @ 2012-11-28 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov; +Cc: David Miller, netdev, andy, fubar
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> writes:
> Actually I did see it from kernel/module.c and didn't come up with it
> myself.
Just FYI, running scripts/checkpatch.pl -f kernel/module.c results in:
total: 27 errors, 65 warnings, 3639 lines checked
NOTE: whitespace errors detected, you may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or
scripts/cleanfile
so I'd not use that as a style guide if I were you....
Bjørn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-28 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-24 12:21 [PATCH] bonding: make arp_ip_target parameter checks consistent with sysfs Nikolay Aleksandrov
2012-11-28 16:23 ` David Miller
2012-11-28 16:33 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2012-11-28 17:34 ` Bjørn Mork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).