From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fernando Gont Subject: Re: VPN traffic leaks in IPv6/IPv4 dual-stack networks/hosts Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:14:02 -0300 Message-ID: <50B6708A.8020701@gont.com.ar> References: <50B4D43A.7030208@gont.com.ar> <50B66CA1.5050907@gont.com.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from web01.jbserver.net ([93.186.182.34]:53701 "EHLO web01.jbserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755683Ab2K1UOQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:14:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/28/2012 05:06 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> If the VPN is supposed to secure all traffic, and the VPN just fails to >> support v6, then for me, it's questionable to have your traffic leak out >> the VPN just because of that lack of IPv6 support. > > Well, what I am saying is that a server may not > be conveying "all", but only "0.0.0.0/0". In such scenarios, doing nothing about IPv6 would be an oversight/error, since IPv4 and IPv6 do not operate isolated from each other. Cheers, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1