From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fernando Gont Subject: Re: VPN traffic leaks in IPv6/IPv4 dual-stack networks/hosts Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 01:38:11 -0300 Message-ID: <50B6E6B3.9090908@gont.com.ar> References: <50B4D43A.7030208@gont.com.ar> <50B66CA1.5050907@gont.com.ar> <50B6708A.8020701@gont.com.ar> <50B6C8A5.2090404@gont.com.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from web01.jbserver.net ([93.186.182.34]:55386 "EHLO web01.jbserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719Ab2K2EiV (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:38:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/29/2012 12:15 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Thursday 2012-11-29 03:29, Fernando Gont wrote: >> >> Not to mention that nowadays, you will miss virtually nothing on the >> Internet by having v6 off. > > Don't judge others by your own standards.. > You don't know me enough to make claims about my standards. Whenever you please, please come up with a list of services (by domain name) that are not available on v4, then talk. And, in any case, what I mentioned still holds true: preventing VPN leaks follows the principle of "least surprise". I said what I had to say... Cheers, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1