From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] doc: make the description of how tcp_ecn works more explicit and clear
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:58:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7B054.3090607@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354214521.3299.30.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 11/29/2012 10:42 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 13:16 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: raj@tardy.usa.hp.com (Rick Jones)
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:53:10 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>> From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
>>>
>>> Make the description of how tcp_ecn works a bit more explicit and clear.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
>>
>> Applied, thanks Rick.
Am I correct in assuming that the documentation is supposed to word-wrap
somewhere around 72 columns? If so, as I have time for floor sweeping I
can try to go through more of it.
>> I think we should change the default to one, to be honest. I thought
>> that's what we were doing by now...
You weren't the only one - what triggered my looking at that description
in the first place was an assertion in the tcpm mailing list that Linux
defaulted to ecn enabled.
>> '2' made sense 10 years ago, but it doesn't really today.
>
> With 1 setting, I for example was enable to connect to a HP device,
> when I was still working for SFR.
>
> (It was an HTTP/HTTPS based administrative software, to manage HP c7000
> enclosures)
If you have some of the particulars, feel free to send them to me
offline. Being one of the cobbler's children I cannot make promises but
I can try to see if whatever it was has evolved since then.
> I would suggest making a large scale experiment before doing this 2->1
> move.
Perhaps one or more of the "development oriented" (term?) distros can
ship with a sysctl.conf file that sets it to one? Or some companies
with rather large Internet presence.
At the time of the tcpm message I went ahead and set it to one on
netperf.org but that is far from a large scale experiment. It has been
a couple weeks and I've captured almost 250000 SYN segments (netperf.org
isn't all that busy). My recollection is that at least one search
engine provider's bots were negotiating ECN and one noteable one was
not. I'd think a search engine provider's crawlers would be a large
scale experiment.
rick jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-28 19:53 [PATCH net-next] doc: make the description of how tcp_ecn works more explicit and clear Rick Jones
2012-11-29 18:16 ` David Miller
2012-11-29 18:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-29 18:58 ` Rick Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B7B054.3090607@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).