netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
To: Jan Luebbe <jlu@pengutronix.de>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: cpsw: implement ioctl for MII
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:34:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BCDB9B.80307@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354542569-6165-3-git-send-email-jlu@pengutronix.de>

On 12/3/2012 7:19 PM, Jan Luebbe wrote:
> This allows using tools like mii-diag on CPSW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe <jlu@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c |   15 +++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 8de3e92..f476c03 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -629,6 +629,20 @@ static void cpsw_ndo_change_rx_flags(struct net_device *ndev, int flags)
>   		dev_err(&ndev->dev, "multicast traffic cannot be filtered!\n");
>   }
>   
> +static int cpsw_ndo_do_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	struct phy_device *phy = priv->slaves[0].phy;
> +
> +	if (!netif_running(ndev))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!phy)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return phy_mii_ioctl(phy, rq, cmd);
> +}
> +
>   static void cpsw_ndo_tx_timeout(struct net_device *ndev)
>   {
>   	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> @@ -670,6 +684,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops cpsw_netdev_ops = {
>   	.ndo_start_xmit		= cpsw_ndo_start_xmit,
>   	.ndo_change_rx_flags	= cpsw_ndo_change_rx_flags,
>   	.ndo_validate_addr	= eth_validate_addr,
> +	.ndo_do_ioctl		= cpsw_ndo_do_ioctl,
>   	.ndo_change_mtu		= eth_change_mtu,
>   	.ndo_tx_timeout		= cpsw_ndo_tx_timeout,
>   	.ndo_get_stats		= cpsw_ndo_get_stats,

Already ndo_do_ioctl is already implemented. Can you rebase the patch 
with latest git repo
and resubmit the patch

Regards
Mugunthan V N

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-03 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-03 13:49 [PATCH 1/3] net: cpsw: replace pr_xxx with dev_xxx functions Jan Luebbe
2012-12-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: cpsw: verify correct number of slaves in DT Jan Luebbe
2012-12-03 17:00   ` Mugunthan V N
2012-12-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: cpsw: implement ioctl for MII Jan Luebbe
2012-12-03 14:16   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-03 17:04   ` Mugunthan V N [this message]
2012-12-04 11:06     ` Jan Lübbe
2012-12-03 16:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: cpsw: replace pr_xxx with dev_xxx functions Mugunthan V N

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50BCDB9B.80307@ti.com \
    --to=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
    --cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).