From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@redhat.com>, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ipv6: do not create neighbor entries for local delivery
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:30:28 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C227B4.6040502@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1702 bytes --]
RFC comment:
Please note that I do not fully understand the impacts of this, thus why
RFC. I don't know if this is the best way to address the issue.
I have a report that when using TPROXY and IPv6, neighbor cache gets
flooded with empty entries, while this does not happen with IPv4. These
empty entries looks like:
# ip -6 neigh show nud all (I masked some bits)
...
20xx::f0xx:x:3xdb dev lo lladdr 00:00:00:00:00:00 NOARP
...
Note that this address was not directly reachable by this host. It was 1
hop away, and still got a neighbor entry.
These entries seems to be not used during input. I disabled their
creation and I could not notice any abnormal results.
Bellow the dashes, my original patch description. Applies to net-next.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Marcelo.
----------------
They will be created at output, if ever needed. This avoids creating
empty neighbor entries when TPROXYing/Forwarding packets for addresses
that are not even directly reachable.
Note that IPv4 already handles it this way. No neighbor entries are
created for local input.
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index
e229a3bc345dc4138a188282c4ab4f1717882832..e6058ab0bb94233da1eec3349e098175d5abf831
100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ restart:
dst_hold(&rt->dst);
read_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
- if (!rt->n && !(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_NONEXTHOP))
+ if (!rt->n && !(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP|RTF_LOCAL)))
nrt = rt6_alloc_cow(rt, &fl6->daddr, &fl6->saddr);
else if (!(rt->dst.flags & DST_HOST))
nrt = rt6_alloc_clone(rt, &fl6->daddr);
--
1.7.11.7
[-- Attachment #2: Seção da mensagem anexada --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C227B4.6040502@redhat.com \
--to=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=fbl@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).