netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] bridge: make buffer larger in br_setlink()
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:15:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C2405E.1070904@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121207185359.GP22569@mwanda>



Am 07.12.2012 19:53, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:07:24PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 07.12.2012 12:10, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
>>> We pass IFLA_BRPORT_MAX to nla_parse_nested() so we need
>>> IFLA_BRPORT_MAX + 1 elements.  Also Smatch complains that we read past
>>> the end of the array when in br_set_port_flag() when it's called with
>>> IFLA_BRPORT_FAST_LEAVE.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I have no clue why nla_parse_nested() need IFLA_BRPORT_MAX elements.
>> but the majory of loop look like
>> for(i=0;i<max;++)
>> most programmers will think this way.
>> So it seems the place to fix is nla_parse_nested().
>> doing not so is asking for trouble (in the long run).
>> At least this function needs a big warning label that (max-1)
>> is actually needed.
>>
> 
> Yeah, nla_parse_nested() is actually documented already.
> 


documenting unexspected behavier is not as much helpfull as changing it.

just my 2 cents,
 wh

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-07 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07  6:18 [patch] bridge: make buffer larger in br_setlink() Dan Carpenter
2012-12-07  9:31 ` Thomas Graf
2012-12-07 11:10   ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2012-12-07 16:07     ` walter harms
2012-12-07 18:53       ` Dan Carpenter
2012-12-07 19:15         ` walter harms [this message]
2012-12-07 17:08     ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-07 19:40     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C2405E.1070904@bfs.de \
    --to=wharms@bfs.de \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).