From: Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@onera.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: edumazet@google.com, daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch,
xemul@parallels.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap.
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:13:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C98000.8040108@onera.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121212.142327.2290797438095968580.davem@davemloft.net>
After a sendmsg, we have to call recvmsg on the ERRQUEUE to get
timestamp. I find that unfortunate indeed...
So this patch fix the tx timestamping (that take place in sendmsg), in
order to be able to get timestamp (via recvmsg).
This seems suboptimal to me, that why i also ask if it wouldn't be
possible to put the timestamp in the ring buffer frame before give it
back to user.
Thanks for your reading.
On 12/12/2012 08:23 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> You're changing the code that handles sendmsg() and then wondering why
> a recvmsg() call doesn't provide a timestamp.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-13 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-12 15:29 [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap Paul Chavent
2012-12-12 19:23 ` David Miller
2012-12-13 7:13 ` Paul Chavent [this message]
2012-12-13 13:29 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-13 16:13 ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 18:17 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-14 7:57 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 10:42 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 13:15 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-13 18:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 18:56 ` [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 22:18 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-13 22:47 ` David Miller
2013-04-14 0:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 0:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 0:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 5:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 0:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 10:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 13:07 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 7:37 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:56 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 16:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-17 10:22 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-19 21:51 ` [PATCH net-next v2] packet: " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 12:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 2:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 10:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 16:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 18:14 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 8:19 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-22 10:25 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 14:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 16:43 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-21 2:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 15:41 ` [PATCH] net-packet: " Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 9:45 ` David Laight
2013-04-15 17:08 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 17:31 ` David Miller
2013-04-15 7:31 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C98000.8040108@onera.fr \
--to=paul.chavent@onera.fr \
--cc=daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).