From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:05:23 -0500 Message-ID: <50D24833.8040803@mojatatu.com> References: <50C4821D.5090206@gmail.com> <50C9B4BB.9060609@mojatatu.com> <50CCE961.5050204@mojatatu.com> <50CDFB6A.3090806@mojatatu.com> <50CE1A04.1000405@mojatatu.com> <50CE3203.9080007@mojatatu.com> <50CF1071.1050405@mojatatu.com> <50D06177.2090905@mojatatu.com> <50D1A8A7.1090002@mojatatu.com> <50D1AB7E.5060000@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Hasan Chowdhury , Stephen Hemminger , Yury Stankevich , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:48006 "EHLO mail-ie0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751911Ab2LSXFZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:05:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k14so3776201iea.10 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:05:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12-12-19 10:52 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > Humm... that's a huge patch for what seems to be equal to act_ipt.c > Let's do a cross-diff: > I was thinking of our little discussion when doing that. The one reason i separated the two is so when the time is right you can patch on top of only act_xt.c and eventually act_ipt.c will die.. Does changes on top of act_xt.c sound palatable to you? Otherwise, you are right - it is overkill cheers, jamal