From: Yury Stankevich <urykhy@gmail.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Hasan Chowdhury <shemonc@gmail.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:14:25 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D46EC1.2040608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D46928.9070809@mojatatu.com>
well.
let me describe whole picture i want to achieve
1. use htb/sfq on ingress.
i got a traffic, and use few u32 filters to direct it to 3 flows,
priority, interactive, and bulk.
as http normally pass to interactive flow, i want to move long donwloads
to the bulk one.
how i trying to find these downloads:
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -m connmark --mark 0
-m connbytes --connbytes 204800: --connbytes-dir both --connbytes-mode
bytes -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0xa
so, http connection where more than 200K downloaded, must got a
connection mark.
since ingress traffic hits qos before netfilter,
i use xt action, to copy connection mark, to a packet.
(action xt -j CONNMARK --restore-mark )
from this moment, i expect packet must have a restored mark
after this, i can use high priority tc filter .. handle 0xa fw flowid 1:102
to direct packet with mark 0xa to 1:102 flow (bulk).
now about a problem.
1. i run http download, once i get 200K - i can see that rule in
POSTROUTING is triggered and connection mark is installed (iptables -L
-n -v mangle -- can show number of packets matched by rule)
2. i see to tc stats for my flows, and i see, that packets still going
to interactive flow, not bulk as i expect.
3. from tc -s filter show dev usb0 parent ffff:
filter protocol ip pref 49152 u32
filter protocol ip pref 49152 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
filter protocol ip pref 49152 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt
0 terminal flowid ??? (rule hit 707 success 707)
match 00000000/00000000 at 0 (success 707 )
action order 1: tablename: mangle hook: NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING
target CONNMARK restore
index 5 ref 1 bind 1 installed 394 sec used 11 sec
Action statistics:
Sent 783783 bytes 707 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
action order 2: mirred (Egress Redirect to device ifb0) stolen
index 5 ref 1 bind 1 installed 394 sec used 11 sec
Action statistics:
Sent 783783 bytes 707 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
i can see that packets must reach xt action.
4. lets try to check packets mark with iptables,
if mark restored by xt action - i must be able to match it in prerouting
rule.
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0xa -j NFLOG --nflog-group 1
but this rule not macthesd - so, no mark is restored by xt action.
maybe im completely wrong here, and such mode can't work for some reason ?
21.12.2012 17:50, Jamal Hadi Salim пишет:
> On 12-12-21 08:13 AM, Yury Stankevich wrote:
>
>> sure,
>> i use it ingress,
>> so, i need to use tc xt action
>> to get mark on the packet, before filter on ifb will run.
>
> Ok. So does ifb see it?
>
>> prerouting rule, in turn, used to test if mark was actually restored.
>
> No experience with connmark, but - in order to restore something has
> to store it, correct?
>
>> in practice:
>> 1. prerouting rule - is not fired. so, no packets with mark was seen.
>> 2. filter on ifb - do not pass traffic to flow configured.
>> looks like `CONNMARK --restore` is not really called.
>>
>
> My suspicion is that it is not set to begin with...
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
--
Linux registered user #402966 // pub 1024D/E99AF373 <pgp.mit.edu>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-09 12:20 tc ipt action Yury Stankevich
2012-12-13 10:58 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-15 21:19 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-15 23:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 0:26 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 0:32 ` [PATCH] build: unbreak linkage of m_xt.so Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 10:30 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 17:03 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 17:43 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 18:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 22:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-12-18 17:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-18 18:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-12-20 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-16 10:22 ` tc ipt action Jamal Hadi Salim
[not found] ` <CAASe=fQT2pVOK0uctdaKL+aOrF8nYeTMfoF15kmd-rC02+7Vnw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-16 16:48 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 18:59 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 19:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 20:36 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 20:41 ` [PATCH] iproute2: act_ipt fix xtables breakage Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-17 12:30 ` RFC [PATCH] iproute2: temporary solution to fix xt breakage Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-17 16:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-19 11:36 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
[not found] ` <CAASe=fRuJdtisEvp7uo=PHwN3nKHqsYDW4Om1gk2MK-vyNvBrA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-18 12:28 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
[not found] ` <CAASe=fR6Hm2dxp=1wDchtrzqnaH6qacHpg2wrsqLfmGpPbQ9Fg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-19 11:44 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-19 11:56 ` [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-19 15:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-19 23:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
[not found] ` <CAASe=fQZGwjM_2PStRE0tje33Doi6TuwJJ3p7x-SRcwq3mQvRg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-19 23:00 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-20 8:54 ` Yury Stankevich
2012-12-20 12:35 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-20 14:59 ` Yury Stankevich
2012-12-21 13:03 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-21 13:13 ` Yury Stankevich
2012-12-21 13:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-21 14:14 ` Yury Stankevich [this message]
2012-12-22 13:19 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-22 13:43 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-22 13:56 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-22 13:58 ` Yury Stankevich
2012-12-22 14:04 ` Florian Westphal
2012-12-22 14:09 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-24 11:34 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-24 11:49 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-12-24 12:19 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-24 13:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-24 14:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-24 18:19 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-26 23:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-21 14:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-21 15:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-12-22 13:42 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-01-07 19:28 ` [PATCH net-next] net: introduce skb_transport_header_was_set() Eric Dumazet
2013-01-08 14:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-01-09 1:52 ` David Miller
2012-12-16 0:27 ` tc ipt action Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-16 0:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 10:43 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 17:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 17:47 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 18:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 20:35 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 21:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-17 12:58 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-17 13:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-18 13:23 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-18 13:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-19 11:43 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2012-12-16 10:26 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D46EC1.2040608@gmail.com \
--to=urykhy@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=shemonc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).